LOS ERRORES DIARIOS DE CEPEDA TRAS EL ASCENSO DE LA ESPRIELLA | Por la Mañana con Carlos Acosta

High-impact election exclusive on our app! How did enthusiasm marketing change the political landscape, and what daily mistakes are sinking Gustavo Petro's candidate? Political scientist, consultant, and public opinion analyst Juan Fernando Giraldo analytically breaks down the electoral phenomenon of Abelardo de la Espriella and the disconnect between the ruling party and the middle class. Don't just rely on superficial social media analyses: download the TVV Network app right now and watch the full interview there. 👉 https://onelink.to/4h4t9t Political scientist and public opinion analyst Juan Fernando Giraldo argues analytically that Abelardo de la Espriella's surprising rise is due to a profound shift in the electorate's psychology, which has migrated from an ecosystem dominated by fear to one of fervent optimism. Giraldo explains that the rise of the right-wing candidate was not a fortuitous event, but rather a gradual process in the final week of the electoral cycle that ultimately overshadowed other conservative options, such as Paloma Valencia's. In his view, the strength of this campaign lies in its ability to transform institutional attacks into catalysts for digital and grassroots defense. In evaluating the performance of the ruling party, the consultant reveals that candidate Iván Cepeda has fallen victim to political arrogance and a severe inability to interpret the country's true political climate. Giraldo argues that, by mechanically relying on President Gustavo Petro's approval ratings, the government failed to prepare its candidate for the logistical and communication demands of the public, resulting in a series of tactical missteps since the preliminary vote count. The expert warns that the radicalization of Petro's base is having a pushback effect on the urban middle class and moderate voters, a crucial segment that represents between 15% and 20% of the electorate. Regarding the transfer of political capital following the institutional support of Álvaro Uribe and Valencia herself for Espriella's candidacy, the public opinion specialist emphatically states that electoral movements do not operate according to automatic mathematical logic. Giraldo reveals that the data shows that at least a fifth of traditional right-wing voters remain undecided and have not immediately joined the majority bloc, forcing marketing teams to refine their recruitment strategies in urban centers during this decisive phase of the campaign. Finally, the analyst addresses with stark realism the impact of public order and the allegations of armed coercion in Colombia's rural peripheries. While he deplores the use of violence and electoral coercion by irregular groups to influence voting in certain regions, Giraldo analytically concludes that, from a strictly numerical perspective, the impact of this phenomenon is marginal in the overall count, unless the national outcome is subject to extremely narrow margins. In the Morning in America with Carlos Acosta | Monday to Friday 7:00 a.m. ET