Cinestill Double-X
A new chapter in film comparisons, I look at the differences between Kodak Tri-X as our standard and Cinestill Double-X. All films in these comparisons were shot using the same lighting and position, developed in Kodak D-76 using the manufacturer’s recommended time, and printed on Ilford Classic FB at 11x14 size using the same contrast settings. The printing time varied to cancel any changes in film base fog from film to film. I included the H&D curves for each film to see the individual differences and we look at the overall print, the spectral response of each film, and the grain characteristics. Channel Merch, Discord, and more: https://linktr.ee/The_Naked_Photographer Music by Hooksounds: https://www.hooksounds.com/ref/thenak... Join this channel to get access to perks: / @thenakedphotographer

Ilford Delta 100

Kodak Double X is ... Interesting

Adox HR 50

CineStill BwXX & Double X: Some Yummy Black and White Film!

Casino Eastman | Eastman Double-X 5222 Review

Did CineStill Ruin Film Photography?

The Silvery Glow of Kodak Double-X

Pan F+ to Tri-X Comparison

Rodinal vs Kodak D76 Vs D96 with Double X (5222) | The Darkroom Knight

Kodak Double-X (5222), Classic B/W Motion Picture Film

Ilford Delta 3200

Ilford Ortho Plus 80

Kodak Tri-X 400 TX vs Ilford HP5 Plus developed in FX 55

D96 any different to Rodinal? KODAK 5222 (DOUBLE X) Motion Picture Film in these two developers.

Why Rodinal is Great (or Bad) for HP5

Whats the best cheap color film? (Ultramax vs Pro Image vs Gold vs Color Plus)

How to Chose Contrast and Exposure from the Test Strip

Kodak Tmax 3200

Ilford HP5 VS Kentmere 400 VS Kodak Tri-X | Black & White film stock comparison

