Kodak Tri-X 400 TX vs Ilford HP5 Plus developed in FX 55
Today I test Tri-X or Kodak 400 TX film and compare it directly to Ilford HP5 Plus. The results are very close but, to me at least, there seems to be a better film. Which one do you think is the best? My name is John Finch. My mission is to preserve the art of analog photography through my youtube videos, my practical books and my website. You can find me at Pictorial Planet, where I combine classic techniques with modern technology. Patreon: / johnfinch Pictorial Planet Website: https://www.pictorialplanet.com My books are available at: https://www.pictorialplanet.com/Book/... Bluesky: pictorial-planet.bsky.social
▶︎
Fomapan 100 emulsion defects: Does a pre-wash actually work?
▶︎
TMax 100 in Rodinal
▶︎
I Bought the Retro Insta360 GO 3S… and Here’s Why
▶︎
Ilford Ortho Plus and Why I Can't Use it!
▶︎
Kodak E100, an alternative to Fuji Velvia ? | Large Format Photography
▶︎
Rodinal vs. HC-110
▶︎
I Made 300 Megapixel Film Scans with a 24MP Camera
▶︎
An affordable Dallmeyer Super Six? Light Lens Lab 50mm f/1.9 Rigid ZS6 Review
▶︎
Noctilux bei Leica – wie das lichtstärkste Objektiv der Welt entsteht
▶︎
I've Shot Film Since 2010. Here's What's Changed.
▶︎
The Art of Zone Focusing: My Settings for 21mm, 28mm, 35mm & 50mm Lenses
▶︎
What has happened in the film Photography Industry?
▶︎
You might not need a fancy camera
▶︎
Kodak TMax 100 Test - Part One
▶︎
The Most Addictive Photography Technique I’ve Tried
▶︎
The Deadliest Weapon of the Ancient World
▶︎
this Leica M3 turned out to be better than the M6
▶︎
These film cameras are so good! Developing Film and Making Prints from the Franka Solida II
▶︎
The FULL VIDEO of Trump they didn’t want released
▶︎