Pan F+ to Tri-X Comparison
Continuing our series of film comparisons, this week we look at Ilford Pan F+. This film is a 50 ISO film with slightly different spectral response to color than the others so far. Green and blues are rendered slightly lighter than red. As I saw with other Ilford film, the overall contrast is identical to Kodak, but the midtones are separated just slightly more in Kodak, giving a false impression of greater contrast. All films for this series were shot at box speed under controlled lighting, processed in D-76 stock for the manufacturer’s published times, and printed at the same time and contrast to an 11x14 print size from a 35mm negative. Channel Merch, Discord, and more: https://linktr.ee/The_Naked_Photographer Music by Hooksounds: https://www.hooksounds.com/ref/thenak... Join this channel to get access to perks: / @thenakedphotographer

Ilford Pan F Plus - Exceptional quality on a Pangaean scale

Tri-X to HP5+ Comparison

Ilford PanF+ 50 ISO Black and White Film | All About Film

Ultimate Image Quality - A Warning

FP4+ To Tri-X Comparison

Ilford HP5 VS Kentmere 400 VS Kodak Tri-X | Black & White film stock comparison

Ilford FP4+ 125 ISO Black And White Film | All About Film

Getting the Best From: Ilford PAN F+ Pt 1

Does all Black and White look the same? ( Kodak, Ilford, Harman)

Controlling Ilford Pan F Film with Pulled Rodinal Development

A Black & White Negative Film Comparison | TMax 100 vs Delta 100 vs Acros II

Did CineStill Ruin Film Photography?

Ilford Delta 3200: What I Learned From 36 Exposures

Cinestill Double-X

50 photos on Ilford Pan F Plus

Kodak Tri-X 400 TX vs Ilford HP5 Plus developed in FX 55

Ranking Every 35mm Film Stock

I’ve Used Hundreds of Cameras — These Are The 10 Best!

How to Develop Color Film for Dummies (Like Me)

