Movimiento ‘UPM 2 NO’ busca la “caída” del contrato con la empresa finlandesa

SEE THIS CONTENT AT enperspectiva.net https://www.enperspectiva.net/home/mo... Lawyer Hoenir Sarthou, a member of the movement, explained the legal and environmental arguments against the second pulp mill, which would be located in the department of Durazno. A new UPM pulp mill on national territory. Optimism in the government? Yes. In the Durazno Municipality? Also. That became clear last Monday at the open Cabinet meeting held in Pueblo Centenario. But meanwhile, the debate remains open. And there are very serious objections, both from a legal and environmental standpoint. The Constitution and Codes Committee of the Chamber of Deputies resolved yesterday to summon the Secretary and Deputy Secretary of the Presidency of the Republic, and the Director of the Planning and Budget Office (OPP), to discuss the terms of the negotiations with the Finnish company. The decision was made after analyzing a document submitted by the UPM2 NO citizens' movement, which is highly critical of the agreement signed by the Executive Branch with UPM. The movement argues that the officials who participated in the negotiations should face impeachment proceedings for repeatedly violating the Constitution. What arguments does this movement use to question the contract prior to the decision-making process for this project? En Perspectiva discussed this with Dr. Hoenir Sarthou, a member of the UPM2 NO Movement and a member of La Mesa. ***