Why I prefer open roads to incomplete cycling infra
Ugh, another talking video. Simply put, if I had to rank infrastructure from most dangerous to safest, I'd do so as follows: 3. Protected lanes without protected intersections 2. Nothing at all or "just paint" 1. Complete design (Dutch) Yes, I am aware of John Forester and vehicular cycling but I only advocate its use in the absence of a complete design. Protect our intersections and eliminate the dangers of having cycling traffic pass on the inside of turning traffic and then it will be complete. Looking at a map of cycling deaths in Toronto over the last few years, I noticed that they both occurred with cyclists at intersections along with turning trucks. I also note that most cyclists on Toronto's social media groups that post about getting hit always seem to be right hooked. Seriously, the Dutch will laugh at this stuff that disappears where it's needed most.

Why Nobody Rides a Bicycle in the USA (Vehicular Cycling)

Why cyclists DO NOT use the cycle lanes

Why the Dutch Wait Less at Traffic Lights

Curb vs Center: What Street Layout Makes Buses Faster?

vid461 - don't honk at cyclists

Bicycling Safely On The Road

Testing the most dangerous roads | Why painted bike lanes suck

Cars are Traffic - Road Riding in Mexico City

Are Dutch Cities Really that Different? Debunking Cycling Myths

vid483 - shoulder checks are important

Painted Bike Lanes Are Atrocious & Here's How to Fix Them

Are Bike Lanes Actually Ruining Our Cities?

Vehicular Cycling Tips Traffic Bicycle Commuting Bike Blogger

Stop Signs Suck and We Should Get Rid of Them

Why Don’t Cyclists Use Bike Lanes?

Why Do the Dutch Still Do This While Every Other Country Stopped Decades Ago?

The Disappointing Distraction of “Vehicular Cycling”

More Lanes are (Still) a Bad Thing (Induced Demand)

I tried cycling to work for a year - and this is what happened

