Celso Furtado e Conceição Tavares: O debate histórico sobre a construção interrompida
In a historic recording, two of Brazil's greatest thinkers, Celso Furtado and Maria da Conceição Tavares, sat down to debate why the country's development project had failed. Recorded decades ago, at the epicenter of the external debt crisis – the "lost decade" – this debate remains the most accurate diagnosis of Brazil's tragedy. Forty years have passed, and what they say still resonates in current headlines, proving that the "interrupted construction" was never resumed. With his characteristic analytical serenity, Celso Furtado returns to his central thesis: the nature of Brazilian underdevelopment. He explains how the country modernized its consumption patterns without internalizing technical progress, creating a structurally dependent economy, vulnerable to external shocks and incapable of generating autonomy. He points to the exhaustion of a model that, although it created an industrial base, failed in its fundamental purpose of building a sovereign nation. Alongside him, Maria da Conceição Tavares brings the urgency of the social crisis. She dissects the "paralysis" caused by external debt, the impact of inflation, and the financialization that was beginning to stifle production. More than just numbers, Conceição speaks about the immense "social debt"—the abyss of inequality that industrialization not only failed to close but, in many respects, deepened. She exposes the model's inability to absorb the workforce and create a minimally just social pact. This dialogue is not just a conversation between two economists; it is the meeting of two giants who have dedicated their lives to thinking about Brazil. They debate the limitations of developmentalism, external strangulation, and the absence of a political project capable of confronting the privileges that have always hindered the country. Watching this debate today is not an exercise in nostalgia. It is a fundamental analytical tool for understanding why Brazil is stagnating, why our crises are cyclical, and why the construction of a just and sovereign country remains painfully interrupted. A masterclass. 00:00:00 – Introduction: The crisis and the theme of "Interrupted Construction" 00:03:00 – Celso Furtado: The exhaustion of the model and the nature of the crisis 00:11:45 – The abandonment of the nation-building project and stagnation 00:13:03 – Furtado: The failure to absorb technical progress and the social debt 00:16:45 – Tavares: Inequality and the inability to solve the social problem 00:21:09 – External strangulation and lack of autonomy 00:24:23 – Maria da Conceição Tavares: External debt and the paralysis of investment 00:26:05 – The political dimension of the crisis and the absence of a pact 00:30:10 – Considerations on the future and the challenges of sovereignty 00:33:04 – Closing: The interruption of a project (Full debate) #economyforall #Brazilianeconomy #economicdevelopment #Brazil

The world has changed: BRICS, crisis, and global power

Roda Viva | Maria da Conceição Tavares | 1995

Why is PEC 65 so controversial? Public debt, the Treasury, and democratic control.

Eduardo Giannetti: Brazil is not the failure Faria Lima thinks it is

A Terra é Redonda Entrevista - LEDA PAULANI

The families that govern Brazil

Celso Furtado: Rare and Complete Interview on Vox Populi (TV Cultura)

UNDERSTAND WHY HUMANITY IS ON THE BRINK OF DIGITAL COLLAPSE, ACCORDING TO EDUARDO GIANNETTI

Celso Furtado e a formação econômica do Brasil

Entrevista histórica com Leonel Brizola

Roda Viva | Celso Furtado Special | July 25, 2020

Oil, banks and power: Tavares' critique of the global order and the limits of the State.

RODA VIVA | PETER SCHMIDT | 06/29/2026

Новый главком ВСУ, Удары по Wildberries, Красная линия Путина. Обсудим с Виталием Портниковым

A economia internacional sob o olhar de Conceição Tavares

Interest rates, debt, and growth: understand the rules that govern Brazil

KARNAL POINTS OUT what is MISSING for the RIGHT to GROW

01. Como a ditadura interrompeu os planos de Celso Furtado para o Nordeste?

Anticolonial currents — and the limits of decoloniality.

