Como Controlar o Pastejo sem Piquetes (e Lucrar Mais)

Enough with stretching wire, hammering stakes, and moving cattle every day! Free your farm from the slavery of fences and increase your pasture production. 👇 ➡️ Secure your spot in the Profitable Continuous Method: https://lp.leandroebert.com.br/contin... For years, we were convinced that the only way to achieve high performance in livestock farming was through intensive rotational grazing. The truth? Cutting-edge science has already proven that continuous grazing is not inferior to rotational grazing — as long as you know how to control the pasture structure. In this video, Agricultural Engineer Leandro Ebert debunks the myth of paddocks and presents High-Performance Continuous Management. A field-validated technique that drastically reduces your infrastructure and labor costs, without sacrificing high average daily gain (ADG) and milk production. What you will master in the Profitable Continuous Method: Pasture Reading: How to understand cattle grazing behavior and respect regrowth speed without needing fences. Exclusive Tools: Access to the stocking rate calculation app and the "Fuxiqueiro" project for height monitoring. Recovery Protocols: Practical strategies to avoid overgrazing or overgrazing. Less Work, More Profit: How students reduced from 44 to just 4 natural paddocks and increased profitability. 💡 Spots for the new class are open for a limited time. Stop working for the pasture and make the pasture work for you. Click the link above and join the class! SCIENTIFIC REFERENCES (The Myth of Rotational Grazing) Global studies proving: controlling pasture structure surpasses dividing it with fences. Briske et al. (2008): Review of 47 studies; concludes that there is no evidence of superiority of rotational grazing over continuous grazing. https://doi.org/10.2111/06-159R.1 Castillo & Wallau (2023): Shows that stocking rate (intensity) dictates productivity, not the fencing method. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20877 Costa et al. (2021): Meta-analysis in tropical pastures; control of structure is key to performance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021... Farrell et al. (2024): Test in New Zealand; frequent paddock changes did not increase milk production. https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2023-0478 Hawkins et al. (2022): Analysis of 22 studies; high-density grazing did not result in gains in production or carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.1... Meyer & Schmiedel (2025): Evaluation in Africa; questions the supposed universal superiority of rotational grazing. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2025... Moojen et al. (2021): 9-year study in Brazil; stocking rate method did not influence productivity per area. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12558 Mota et al. (2024): Meta-analysis (Mombaça/Tanzania); height-based grazing management is the most effective for beef cattle. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP23326 Rouquette Jr. et al. (2023): 30 global experiments; more than 70% saw no difference per hectare between systems. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad069 #BeefCattle #DairyCattle #PastureManagement #ContinuousGrazing #Pasture-BasedMilk #ProfitableLivestock #Agronomy #AnimalScience #PastureIsMore