Дисертації за $6к та долари з Австралії: «перли» зі співбесід з кандидатами у судді

For nearly six months, the High Qualification Commission of Judges has been vetting candidates for seats on the general appellate courts. These interviews are a goldmine of bizarre stories: from fake academic degrees and assets hidden under relatives' names to "creative" ways of explaining suspicious income. Despite these red flags, the candidates are still vying for the judicial robe, high salaries, and lifelong pensions. While these competitions rarely make the headlines, they determine who will be reviewing court rulings tomorrow and who might let corrupt officials off the hook. If we turn a blind eye to this absurdity now, the consequences will only get worse. 00:00 – Intro 01:34 – Inside the interviews 03:38 – What’s at stake for the candidates 05:12 – Oleksandr Korolenko: Dissertations for sitting judges 08:53 – Petro Tarasevych and the "PhD" scandal 12:05 – Oleksandr Yatsun and government-issued housing 15:10 – Oleksandr Kutsenko: Facing fraud allegations 17:24 – Bees and berries: Pavlo Kovalenko’s excuses 22:06 – Iryna Hazdaika-Vasylyshyn and the Australian cash 26:02 – Reality of current judicial selection