Andrea Johnson Under Fire! Commission Grills IDAC Boss Over Alleged Lies, Perjury & Section 27

Andrea Johnson Under Fire! Commission Grills IDAC Boss Over Alleged Lies, Perjury & Section 27 Andrea Johnson EXPOSED: IDAC Boss Contradicts Herself Under Oath — Perjury, Secret Investigations & Section 27 Scandal Unpacked IDAC Director Andrea Johnson faces brutal cross-examination as commissioners catch her in a web of contradictions. Under fire: how did 8 extra names appear in a corruption investigation authorization with NO factual basis linking them to any offense? Why did Chief Perumal contact complainant Fadil Adams and obtain a secret list of names BEFORE any investigation was authorized — and why does IDAC have no written record of it? Commissioners expose a stunning contradiction between Johnson's ad hoc committee testimony and her testimony here: she told one body she "did not know" about a complaint to the Minister's office — but evidence (annexure MK16) proves otherwise. She also claimed the Adams referral "landed on her desk" in mid-December 2024 — despite already signing a Section 28(3) investigation authorization on 6 December. Commissioner Baloy calls it "improbable" she forgot. Commissioner Kumalo grills her on classified intelligence documents allegedly slipped under Adams' office door — documents IDAC never verified, never saw, and never referred to the proper authority as the law requires. Is IDAC operating without any real rules — letting senior officials go on their own "frolic"? Watch the full grilling. ⚠️ This is real testimony from an official commission of inquiry. Judge for yourself. 0:31 - Section 27 affidavit: where did the extra names come from? 1:37 - "I cannot say her recollection is wrong" — Johnson's memory gap 2:09 - Perumal engaged complainant before investigation was even authorized 4:46 - Did Perumal jump the gun without authority? 6:35 - "There isn't a process for that action" — bombshell admission 8:07 - You escalate before you even consider the conduct? 10:37 - No SOPs, no protocols — "it's how we practice" 14:41 - Commissioner Baloy: "We do not speak to witnesses before a decision" 19:48 - The mystery list of 12 names — who authorized it? 21:34 - What's the factual basis for accusing 8 unnamed people? 26:41 - "IDAC uses its powers to target citizens without factual basis" 29:46 - Baloy: "You'd be looking at the wrong document" 32:56 - Did you even ask Perumal where the list came from? 34:44 - Perumal claims NO recollection of giving the list 35:13 - Contradiction #1: ad hoc committee vs commission testimony 39:01 - Did you know Adams also complained to the Minister? "Not at all." 40:51 - Commissioner Kumalo: "What was ad hoc to believe?" 41:22 - The IDAC-approached-Adams vs Adams-came-to-IDAC contradiction 43:13 - Timeline collapse: referral "mid-December" vs authorization signed Dec 6 44:45 - Baloy: "It's improbable you didn't remember" 49:56 - Classified intelligence documents pushed under Adams' door 51:20 - "It was a hypothetical example" — walking it back 54:12 - Did you refer the classified documents to the proper authority? "I did not." 59:07 - The Minister's office complaint trail — Johnson says "not at all" again 1:02:11 - Why didn't you flag this when confronted with the Jacobs report? #madlangacommission #AndreaJohnson #IDAC #SouthAfrica #CorruptionCommission #FadilAdams #ChiefPerumal #CommissionOfInquiry #SAPolitics #BreakingNews #SouthAfricanNews #Accountability #JusticeSA #Perjury #WhistleblowerSA