国産圧勝？！8GBメモリ　スマホや非力なパソコン+eGPUで　ローカルAIはどこまで動くのか？

Asking about accurate demographics and the Senkaku Islands! Parliamentary records, government public documents... Which LLM is the most reliable? My personal results are as follows: Qwen3.5 gemma4 LLM-JP Later, I asked Qwen3.5 about the Senkaku Islands again on a 16GB PC, and the results were as follows: As expected, the situation changes depending on the amount of memory, so a complete comparison in the best environment is difficult. ---------------- The territorial dispute over the Senkaku Islands (Chinese name: Diaoyu Islands) is an *still unresolved territorial dispute* between the Japanese and Chinese governments, and there is no definitive international determination (such as a ruling by the International Court of Justice) of who the "ultimate owner" is. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the "current owner" in a single statement from the perspective of international law and diplomacy. However, the respective positions and legal basis can be summarized as follows. 1. Japan's Position The Japanese government claims to have *sovereignty* over the Senkaku Islands. The main reasons for this claim are as follows: *Denial of Invalid Claim (Japan's Argument):* Based on the fact that Taiwan and Okinawa were acquired by the Qing Dynasty immediately after Taiwan and Penghu were acquired by the Qing Dynasty in 1895 (Meiji 28), Japan argues that the islands should be considered Japanese territory under the Imperial Constitution. *Effective Control:* Japan claims to have continuously exercised national governing functions over the islands since 1895, including the establishment of administrative agencies, surveying, security, defense, and fishing regulations (effective control). *Continuation of Invalid Claim:* In response to the Chinese government's protests since 1971, Japan argues that effective control had already been established prior to that time, and therefore the establishment of sovereignty is valid under international law. 2. China's Position The Chinese government claims that the Senkaku Islands have been *inherently Chinese territory* since ancient times, and that Japan's claim is **invalid**. The main reasons for this claim are as follows: *Historical Basis:* It claims that records of China's rule over these islands since ancient times, and that maps from the Ming Dynasty depict the islands as Chinese territory. *Invalid Japanese Claim:* It claims that Japan's claim in 1895 was not made with China's consent and is therefore invalid under international law. *Difference from the Annexation of Taiwan, Penghu, and Okinawa:* While Japan's annexation of Taiwan, Penghu, and Okinawa is recognized as a formal transfer from the Qing Dynasty, the Senkaku Islands were outside that scope, and therefore Japan's claim is considered invalid. 3. International Context *International Community's Response:* International law, such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), defines the rights to marine resources (exclusive economic zone) and does not determine the sovereignty of islands themselves. *US Position:* Under the Japan-US Security Treaty, the US military includes the Senkaku Islands as a target for defense. However, the US maintains a neutral stance, viewing the sovereignty of the Senkaku Islands itself as a "sovereignty dispute." *Diplomatic Negotiations:* Currently, both countries are seeking a resolution through diplomatic negotiations and discussions, but no concrete compromise has been reached. Conclusion Currently, **Japan exercises effective control (administration and security) over the Senkaku Islands**, and they are under the authority of the Japanese government. However, the fact remains that **the sovereignty itself is disputed between Japan and China, and a final ruling under international law has not yet been made**. Therefore, rather than unilaterally determining which country owns the territory, it would be more accurate to say that this is a territorial dispute between Japan and China.