The landmark case over rights and freedoms at the Supreme Court
Today, a case involving Quebec’s use of the notwithstanding clause is going before the Supreme Court of Canada. In the last decade, many provinces have used the clause to override federal powers to pass controversial laws. While cases involving the notwithstanding clause have been taken to the Supreme Court before, none have had the magnitude of being precedent-setting that could have major implications for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The hearing will be one of the longest at the country’s highest court in a decade. The Globe’s justice reporter, David Ebner, explains how the clause came to be, why provinces have used it, and whether the case will change the power balance between provincial and federal governments in Canada’s charter. Subscribe to The Globe and Mail's Morning Update to get stories directly in your inbox: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/newsl...

A reality check on Alberta separatism

Why holding government to account in Ontario could get harder

U.S. Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia & Stephen Breyer Conversation on the Constitution (2009)

Drones and the future of Canada’s military industry

Uncovering FIFA’s costly World Cup demands on Canadian cities

Judge Barrett's Civics Lesson on Originalism

How alcohol sales explain Canada’s internal trade problem

LAWYER: If Cops Ask "Where Are You Coming From?" - Say These Words

A crack in Carney’s Liberal caucus over climate

Why Sweden Is Becoming a Defense Powerhouse as Europe Rearms

The pressure is on for Canada to meet growing energy demand

What’s behind the surge in military enlistment in Canada

The recession question

Will the Supreme Court overturn Quebec's Bill 21?

Unpaid and overworked: labour violations in Canadian trucking

Unpacking Carney's Defence Announcement

Lawyer Reacts: SCOTUS ENDS Birthright Citizenship?

Patrolling the Arctic with the Canadian military

Marbury v Madison - the most important case in US Supreme Court history

