What controls the range of aseismic to seismic behavior on subduction interfaces? | Dr. Ake Fagereng
What controls the range of aseismic to seismic behavior on subduction plate interfaces? Talk provided by Dr. Ake Fagereng from the Cardiff University on November 12th, 2025 as part of the SZ4D International Webinar Series. For more information, visit www.sz4d.org Full Webinar Description: Subduction plate interfaces are responsible for all instrumentally recorded earthquakes with magnitude ≥ 9.0, yet they can also be steadily creeping, and produce ‘slow earthquakes’. We look at geological observations from subduction plate boundaries to discuss this range of fault slip styles and discuss controls on this continuum of behaviours. Critically, the geological observations imply that the subduction thrust interface is a shear zone up to kilometers thick. In such zones, various components may be active at any one time, and plate boundary displacement can potentially be accommodated by volumetric, viscous deformation operating at shear stresses much lower than expected for frictional sliding. However, the existence of mutually cross-cutting structures formed by viscous and frictional deformation requires that, locally and transiently, either (1) frictional strength is reduced, or (2) shear stress is increased, to facilitate a rheological switch from viscous to frictional. One mechanism to reduce frictional strength is to increase fluid pressure, for example through ongoing metamorphic reactions in subducting sediments and oceanic crust. In this case, frictional failure is fluid- rather than stress-driven. A stress-driven form of failure may, on the other hand, arise if there are local high strength zones where displacement is not fully accommodated by viscous shear. In either case, whether a large damaging earthquake can be generated, or slip is limited to a slow event, becomes a function of the available area that is frictionally unstable. This is consistent with the hypothesis that relatively heterogeneous fault segments, e.g. related to subduction of topographically rough seafloor, are less likely to produce large magnitude earthquakes than relatively homogeneous fault segments.

Upper plate fault-triggered hazards and interactions above subduction zones | Dr. Sean Gallen

Timescales and episodicity of fluid flow along the subduction interface | Dr. Sara Penniston-Dorland

HDR UK Wales Webinar 6: Transforming Data for Trials

Thermal, Deformation, and Hydration Evolution of the Forearc Mantle Wedge Corner | Dr Ikuko Wada

Relief Construction and Permanent Deformation at Plate Boundaries in Chile | Dr. Felipe Aron | SZ4D

A novel approach to modeling and decision making on future earthquake risk | Dr. Gemma Cremen

Professor Jiang: World War 3 Is About To Begin, Let Me Explain!

Britain Sold Palestine to Pay Its WWI Debt. The Balfour Declaration Was a Banking Deal!

If This Dam Fails, It Pollutes Half of Europe.

4070-1 - CAN Changing Clim Report 2026: findings from new national clim science assessment - Part 1

The Death Toll From This May Exceed 10,000+...

Health & Safety Digest S4 E3: Mastering the NEBOSH Diploma with Jayne Morgan

The Lost Supervolcano: The Biggest Eruption in Human History - Full Documentary

Geology 101 with Willsey, Episode #4: Convergent Plate Boundaries

The North Sea Tsunami: Britain’s Deadliest Disaster

Denis Noble: "Neo-Darwinism Is Dead" | We Need A Biology Beyond Genes

PhD opportunities in compound semiconductor manufacturing

Real Images Of Venus Show That Something Is Seriously Off With The Planet

2050-2 - Atmosphere - Theoretical to applied science - Part 2

