AM Singhvi's Brilliant Arguments in High Court- "Governor Cannot Enter This House!"

Karnataka High Court. Senior Supreme Court Adv. AM Singhvi arguing. This Video is Strictly for LEGAL AWARENESS & EDUCATION Purpose only This court proceeding revolves around a legal challenge concerning the powers and actions of a governor, particularly in relation to judicial review, the governor's exercise of discretion, and the requirement for clear reasoning behind decisions made by the governor in cases involving the chief minister and the council of ministers. Here's a summary of the key issues discussed: Governor's Power and Judicial Review: The case centers on the governor's exercise of power, which is traditionally seen as being exercised on the advice of the council of ministers (chief minister and cabinet). The petitioner argues that when the governor exercises independent discretion (for example, rejecting the council's advice), there needs to be clear and robust reasoning provided for such decisions, especially when the decision is unusual or in an "exceptional area." Double Whammy: The term "double whammy" is used to describe the situation where the governor, who ordinarily cannot enter the legislative house (the legislature) in most cases, has special powers to do so in specific circumstances. However, the concern raised is that when the governor does take action, they do not provide any reasoning for their decision. This lack of reasoning undermines accountability and transparency, especially in constitutional matters. Issue of Bias and Manifest Irrationality: A significant part of the discussion is about the potential bias of the governor when they disagree with the advice of the council of ministers. The argument is made that if the governor takes a different view, there must be a clear, demonstrable reason that shows the council's advice was manifestly irrational. The distinction is drawn between apparent bias and manifest irrationality, with a focus on ensuring that if the governor disagrees with the council's advice, it must be based on solid and demonstrable evidence. Disagreement with the Cabinet: The court is asked to consider whether it is appropriate for the governor to independently disagree with the advice of the cabinet. The submission argues that if the governor disagrees, the reasons for such a disagreement must be explicitly stated in writing, and must demonstrate that the cabinet's advice was irrational or flawed. Clarification of Legal Principles: The court seeks clarification about whether the governor’s decisions can be presumed to be biased simply because they are in disagreement with the chief minister or cabinet. The petitioner argues that bias should not be assumed automatically, and each case should be judged based on the specific facts and evidence presented. In essence, the court is deliberating on the extent to which a governor can exercise independent discretion, the necessity for transparent reasoning in such decisions, and the role of judicial review in ensuring that such actions are justified and not arbitrary or irrational. The issue of potential bias is also central, with a focus on ensuring that decisions are not made based on presumptions but on clear, objective analysis. MP High Court Live, High Court Live Streaming, Patna High Court Live Stream, Gujarat High Court Live Stream, Madhya Pradesh High Court Live Stream, MP High Court Live, Court Room Live Stream, Court Room, Legal Fact in India , Patna High Court Live Stream Today, Indian High Court live Stream, Justice Jitendra Kumar, Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Justice Sandeep Kumar, Justice Vivek Agarwal, Justice DY Chandrachud Important - If you have anything against my uploads or have any suggestions, please contact me at [email protected]. lawyer attorney immigration lawyer lawyers near me personal injury lawyer divorce lawyer car accident lawyer divorce lawyers law firm divorce attorney 📑*Fair Use Policy -* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. @lawnowTV #law #judge #advocate #lawyer #livestream #court #courtlive #argument #courtroomlive #courtroomdrama #legaladvice #legaleducation #legal #powerofjudge #ias #ips #police #judiciary #learnlaw #supremecourtofindia #legalknowledge #legaleducation #younglawyers #highcourt #patnahighcourt #bihar #biharnews #courtproceedings #ipc #crpc #cpc #evidence #clat #lawentrance #biharjudiciary #biharjudicial #exams #bpsc #patnapolice #biharpolice #gujaratpolice