[지식뉴스 EP.23] "서울, 20년간 도시경쟁력 잃어"...‘아파트 공화국’이 치를 대가 (ft.김경민 서울대 도시계획학과 교수) / 교양이를 부탁해

01:25 Did the "super cycle" that began have an impact on the Toheo system? 02:12 "Why policies to capture demand have always failed" 03:46 Global trend: "Money liquidity flows to real estate" 05:27 Increased affordability for "inflation-hedging real estate" 06:14 When prices rise by 200 million won, they rise by 500 million won. What is the cumulative increase in Gangnam and non-Gangnam? 07:00 Can Ma, Yong, and Seong become the next Gangnam? 08:26 Why Gangnam became a wealthy neighborhood with the massive introduction of amenities 12:56 Floor area ratio is a trick; OO is what revitalizes cities 14:20 The West is like New York... Can Seoul become G2? 17:52 The 2 trillion won DDP yield is 0%... Why Seoul suffered a "lost 20 years" 19:26 Business clusters continue to expand even in the AI ​​era 20:22 Can K-pop help Seoul achieve Swiftnomics? 22:10 Why the Great Seoul Plan is Needed "The past 20 years have been a lost Seoul. In fact, every attempt to suppress housing prices by increasing Gangnam prices has failed. Frankly, we need to acknowledge that government policies can't suppress the market. In the real estate market, once a major upswing occurs, it lasts for years. Therefore, abolishing the land transaction permit system at this time sends a very negative signal to the market, and the market will react accordingly. Because of the expected demand, I mentioned last year that we were in a super cycle. Essential prices were rising. But I don't know whether the land transaction permit system further increased intrinsic prices. We need to look at the data two to three months later. But if the land transaction permit system were abolished again six months later, I believe it would be extremely chaotic because of the current upward trend. Abolishing it then likely won't be easy. Since last year, I've been talking about creating a massive supply of new apartments to open up the market. They haven't opened it yet. Not yet. Of course, I'm not saying I'm right about everything, but we have to do something. So, from my perspective, policymakers have been taking the market too lightly since last year. So, ultimately, the easiest thing to do is to capture demand. But when we capture demand, the wealthy are fine. In reality, it's the less wealthy who suffer. The goal of national policy is to facilitate affordable housing for the middle class and working class. If we block it because it seems like prices will rise, that only benefits the relatively wealthy. So, it's extremely discriminatory. That in itself is." -Kim Kyung-min, Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Seoul National University [Production Team] Planning and Directing: David / Video Reporting: Park Seung-won, Joo Yong-jin / Writer: Yoon Dan-bi / Editing: Hyun Seung-ho / Content Design: Ok Ji-su / Intern: Kang Da-hyun [Business Inquiries] Please Take Care of My Culture, Appearance, Sponsorship, and Content Inquiries: [email protected] #PleaseTakeCulture #SeoulRealEstate #GangnamRepublic #SeoulUrbanPlanning #ToheoJe #ApartmentPrices #RedevelopmentReconstruction #Arena #DDP #JamsilSportsComprehensiveKnowledgeNews Knowledge News that gets smarter the more you listen, Please Take Care of My Culture @sbs_explained Copyright Ⓒ SBS. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution, and use of AI learning are prohibited.