¿EE.UU. DEJÓ SOLO A LOS VENEZOLANOS? | Por la Mañana con Carlos Acosta y José Vicente Carrasquero

📲 Cool Analysis vs. Chaos! Discover why political scientist José Vicente Carrasquero asserts that sensationalist rumors are sabotaging political clarity and what US cooperation really means after the double earthquake. Download our app now and watch this valuable full interview to avoid misinformation. 👉 https://onelink.to/4h4t9t Public opinion and electoral campaign consultant José Vicente Carrasquero draws a sharp line between methodological analysis and the visceral narratives flooding social media after the double earthquake in Venezuela. Carrasquero warns that citizens must focus strictly on the "hard facts" and what is actually available: "US control over the Venezuelan regime." He explained that the White House has strategically decided to operate with the available actors on the ground to manage the humanitarian crisis, a pragmatic approach that, while generating deep unease and stomach-churning tension among the population upon seeing photographs of operational cooperation between US officials like John Barrett and regime figures like Diosdado Cabello, responds to a logistical and supervisory logic, not to a political capitulation. Faced with opinion pieces suggesting a rift within democratic forces, the consultant categorically denies any distancing between the US government and the leadership of María Corina Machado. Carrasquero harshly criticized content creators and journalists who propagate fictitious scenarios to profit from collective anxiety, dubbing this phenomenon "the likes industry." He argued that this disinformation ecosystem thrives on monetizable sensationalism and distorts the role of the opposition leadership, posing the ironic question: "What do people expect? For María Corina Machado to arrive with a pick and shovel and start digging into the situation?" He explained that, on the contrary, Machado is abroad actively coordinating international support and keeping diplomatic channels open. The analyst appeals to analytical maturity and uses a medical metaphor to explain how the complex Venezuelan reality should be processed at this time. He maintains that an analyst or a citizen should act like the expert neurosurgeon who has to operate on their own mother's brain: isolating emotion in order to intervene with professional precision. For Carrasquero, "politics isn't based on gut feelings," and he warns that any judgment tainted by personal desire or frustration has a very high probability of being wrong, obscuring the historical gratitude that civil society should maintain toward the strategic actions of the U.S. administration, which committed its own political capital to the country's freedom. Finally, Carrasquero assesses the impact of the natural disaster on the transition agenda. He acknowledges that the two earthquakes have drastically altered the immediate priorities on the national stage, forcing a shift in public and international attention from the reactivation of oil infrastructure or the severe electricity crisis to the urgent resolution of a large-scale humanitarian emergency. However, he insists that political transitions consist of structural processes and stages that continue behind the scenes, and therefore calls for calm among the population to avoid succumbing to discouragement induced by unfounded rumors. In the Morning in America with Carlos Acosta | Monday to Friday 7:00 pm ET