Politici russi implorano Putin: "Fermiamo la guerra, non reggiamo più"

💎 Special Offer: Starting at just $4.99! Get 50% off full map access + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing This video analyzes why the political class in the Russian Federation has begun to call for a cessation of hostilities. In this context, the Russian economic system is showing a diminished capacity to further sustain the costs of the conflict, signaling imminent structural collapse in the face of growing pressure from elites and the progressive weakening of state control mechanisms. Currently, even Russian political officials are clearly aware of the gravity of the overall situation, urging the Kremlin leadership to halt war operations before they lead to the disintegration of the state. Recently, State Duma Deputy Renat Suleymanov stated that ending the conflict is an urgent necessity, as the national economy is unable to sustain the current operational pace. The parliamentarian also highlighted how 40 percent of the federal budget is already allocated to defense and internal security spending, crowding out ordinary spending items. Military appropriations are simultaneously fueling inflationary pressures, officially standing at 5 percent, and forcing severe contractions in the civilian sector. Suleymanov warned that, even after the cessation of hostilities, Moscow will face complex challenges related to the social reintegration of hundreds of thousands of veterans exposed to extreme levels of violence on the ground, highlighting how these financial and social burdens will weigh on the Federation even in peacetime. The convergence of budget deficits, demographic crisis, and infrastructural vulnerabilities drastically reduces the Russian economy's margins for sustainability in a conflict of this intensity. Specifically, data from the Ukrainian General Staff indicate that overall losses suffered by Moscow's forces have exceeded 1.4 million dead and wounded. This figure is critical because, over the course of the current year, the Federation's monthly recruitment capacity has failed to compensate for the rate of attrition in the field, resulting in a sharp reduction in personnel reserves. Domestically, the Federation's layered air defense system is no longer capable of ensuring the comprehensive protection of critical infrastructure, having lost nearly two hundred anti-aircraft weapon systems since the beginning of the year. This shortfall exposes refining complexes and export terminals to Ukrainian precision attacks. Kiev has exploited these structural vulnerabilities, reducing Moscow's energy export capacity and forcing the country to import refined petroleum products. Due to these incursions, revenues from the hydrocarbon sector are drastically reduced, prompting Russian officials to denounce the unsustainability of the current war effort. In this scenario, Zelensky's open letter to Putin appears as a psychological warfare operation aimed at tapping into the growing dissent within the Russian elite, which possesses the capital, influence networks, and institutional access to pose a direct threat to the Kremlin's stability. The proposal for a negotiating channel is part of Kiev's strategy to highlight Moscow's economic weaknesses and undermine the narrative of Russian invincibility, a trend confirmed by the emergence of harsh criticism from Russian officials. The diplomatic initiative aimed to focus the Russian oligarchy's attention on the billions in losses resulting from asset freezes and the sanctions regime, shifting the perception of the conflict from a patriotic burden to a personal financial threat.