In the matter of an application by Siobhan Mclaughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)
[2018] UKSC 48 UKSC 2017/0035 In the matter of an application by Siobhan Mclaughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) The appellant lived with her partner (Mr Adams) as man and wife for 23 years until his death in January 2014. During their 23-year relationship the appellant and her partner had four children together, all of whom lived with them. A key component of the family income is derived from state benefits. The appellant claimed Bereavement Payment and Widowed Parent’s Allowance but was refused by the respondent because she was neither married to nor a civil partner of Mr Adams at the date of his death. Both these state benefits are contributory and are based on payments by a deceased from occupational income and payable under the Social Security Contributions and Benefits (Northern Ireland) Act 1992. The appellant applied for judicial review of the refusal. The judge granted her application, and made a Declaration of Incompatibility that section 39A(1) was incompatible with Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights read with Article 8, in that it unlawfully discriminated against her based on her marital status. The Court of Appeal overturned the judge’s decision. The issue is: whether section 39A(1) of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits (Northern Ireland) Act 1992 which provides for payment of a Widowed Parent’s Allowance is incompatible with Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights read with Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol 1. The Supreme Court, by a majority of 4 to 1, allows the appeal

Application by the N.I.H.R.C. for Judicial Review (N.I.) & The Attorney General's Reference
![In the matter of an application by JR222 for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2024] UKSC 35](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kX1frFIWOYc/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEjCNACELwBSFryq4qpAxUIARUAAAAAGAElAADIQj0AgKJDeAE=&rs=AOn4CLDmuy6cLoUMX09UMpF2R0L69rwHQg)
In the matter of an application by JR222 for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2024] UKSC 35

In the matter of an application by Jason Loughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)

Supreme Court Ruling on Deprivation of Liberty and Cheshire West 'Acid Test'

ITN Exclusive: Margaret Thatcher's Dramatic First Interview After Being Ousted From Power (1991)

Royal Courts of Justice: Dame Victoria Sharp's Swearing - In Ceremony

A When & How Guide to Bringing & Defending Judicial Review Proceedings, Parissa Najah

Bringing a claim for judicial review substantive hearing and judgments

Beyond the Science-Politics Divide in Public Health

Judicial Review in Ireland-What You Need to Know

I visited England to investigate the lives of African Immigrants in the UK

R (on the app. of Steinfeld and Keiden) v Sec. of State for the International Development

What the UK Supreme Court hearing on “deprivation of liberty” means for us all

Bringing a judicial review claim after permission

R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal: Mark Elliott and Alison Young

An application by McQuillan/McKenna/McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) (Nos 1, 2 and 3)

Stop Saying Sir and Madam - Learn Titles British People REALLY Say

David Anderson QC: Do terrorists have human rights

Immigration Appeals and Judicial Review - An Explanation and Overview

