Plessy v Ferguson - The Logical Flaw in this Infamous Supreme Court Case
This is a lecture video about the landmark 1896 US Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537. This case enshrined the infamous "Seperate but Equal" doctrine that formed the foundation of segregation in the American South for decades. This lecture explains the details of the case, and the central argument made by Justice Brown. I claim that Brown equivocates in the crucial portion of his argument, which putatively takes the form of Modus Tollens, a form reasoning in deductive logic. This logical flaw, of course, is entirely separate from the sheer racism of the court opinion. This lecture of part of a Philosophy of Law course.

▶︎
Marbury v Madison - the most important case in US Supreme Court history

▶︎
An argument against objective morality that defeats itself

▶︎
Korematsu v United States - the U.S. Supreme Court Case legalizing Japanese Internment

▶︎
The Details of Brown v Board of Ed - - US Supreme Court

▶︎
Don't Talk to the Police

▶︎
The real reason the Boy Scouts disappeared

▶︎
When Genius Teens Destroy Corrupt Cops

▶︎
McFall v Shimp - Landmark Court Case - Should the government force someone to donate bone marrow?

▶︎
Biden Plays Intellectual and Scalia Laughs Off the Exchange

▶︎
Plato's Euthyphro - Which comes first: God or Morality?

▶︎
Legal Positivism - the dominant theory in jurisprudence

▶︎
"Separate But Equal" | Plessy v. Ferguson

▶︎
Last Lecture Series: “How to Win Without Crushing Your Soul” - Graham Weaver

▶︎
Riggs v Palmer - famous court case about a grandson murdering his grandfather

▶︎
Three Supreme Court Justices Return to Yale

▶︎
Plessy v. Ferguson | The Gilded Age (1865-1898) | US history | Khan Academy

▶︎
Oral Argument on birthright citizenship: Trump v. Barbara

▶︎
The famous Chinese Room thought experiment - John Searle (1980)

▶︎
The Loophole That Runs the Supreme Court

▶︎
