AIで医学論文は書けるのか？ 経験ある医師が試して感じた限界

AI can produce surprisingly fast and plausible-sounding English drafts of medical papers. But can they be submitted as is? From the perspective of a clinician who has written medical papers, I had AI write a medical review article. Of course, I didn't submit it! To put it simply, the writing is well-structured. However, from a physician and researcher's perspective, I wasn't easily convinced. The problem is that AI doesn't truly understand the history of the field, the context of the literature, the flow of research, or the validity of future prospects. Furthermore, verifying literature information, correcting the AI-like quality, and restructuring the argument requires considerable effort. In this video, based on a real-world example of having AI write a medical review article, we will consider: "What are the dangers of AI-generated papers?" "How can AI be used without undermining the capabilities of researchers?" We have entered an era where using AI in paper writing is acceptable. However, it's not something to completely delegate. Humans should think; AI should assist. If this order is wrong, I believe neither papers nor researchers will develop. About this YouTube account: AI channel by a doctor https://note.com/notionbooks/n/n18b50... X https://x.com/Notion_Books note https://note.com/notionbooks