司法書士過去問向上委員会２０２５「第１１話　どちらかと言うと既判力の問題？」

We will improve the multiple-choice questions from the Judicial Scrivener Examination so that they are more useful to test-takers. We will do it again this year! Please look forward to the "Judicial Scrivener Past Questions Improvement Committee 2025"! This time, we will deal with the following past questions under the title "Episode 11: Is it more of a question of res judicata?" [Today's guest past question improvement] Civil Procedure Law, Reiwa 4, Question 3, Option A If the defendant acknowledges the existence of a claim that is already due for performance in the discussion before the lawsuit is filed and it is clear that the defendant will not dispute this after the lawsuit is filed, the suit for the performance of the claim will not be found to have merit. Civil Procedure Law, Reiwa 4, Question 3, Option B In a main suit seeking confirmation that Land A is owned by the plaintiff, a counterclaim is filed seeking the return of Land A based on the defendant's ownership, assuming that Land A is owned by the defendant, and the main suit seeking confirmation of ownership will not be found to have merit. Civil Procedure Law, Reiwa 4, Question 3, Option E If a creditor has a deed of execution for the credit, the benefit of the claim will not be recognized for a claim for performance related to the same credit. ★Recommended Courses★ Selected Past Questions, Basic Skills Completion Drills, Selected Six Laws https://www.itojuku.co.jp/book/newboo... Itojuku Judicial Scrivener Exam https://www.itojuku.co.jp/shiken/shih... #Judicial Scrivener #Judicial Scrivener Exam #Past Question Improvement Committee