Mountains from sand grains: Advances in detrital provenance
P-T-t talk 39 - Mountains from sand grains: Advances in detrital provenance Speaker: Dr Chris Mark (Swedish Museum of Natural History) Description: Detrital geochronology is a powerful tool to interrogate the sedimentary archive of (paleo-)hinterland tectonism, metamorphism, and exhumation, and can also be applied to modern river sediment as a first-pass tool to establish regional bedrock ages. The popular zircon U-Pb detrital geochronometer has seen widespread adoption for these tasks (4,173/5,100 results for the search term detrital geochronology also contain the term zircon U-Pb; Clarivate Analytics Web of Science). However, zircon fertility is strongly biased to intermediate to felsic source rocks. Moreover, zircon crystallization is volumetrically limited in metamorphic terranes which do not achieve anataxis (e.g., Moecher & Samson, 2006), and is typically restricted to rim overgrowths which are vulnerable to mechanical destruction during fluvial transport, and which are challenging to detect and analyse (e.g., Campbell et al., 2005). Therefore, it is desirable to develop complementary provenance tools for sub-anatectic settings, as well as tools targeting more abundant rock-forming minerals for use with small-volume samples (e.g., drillcore). Here, I present case studies of emerging detrital provenance techniques, with particular application to modern and past orogenic systems. Established alternative detrital phases include the U-Pb system in apatite, monazite, titanite, and garnet. The advent of LA-ICPMS systems equipped with mass-filtered online reaction cells now also permits the routine use of β-decay systems by overcoming parent-daughter isobaric interferences. These include Lu-Hf in garnet and apatite, and Rb-Sr in K-phases including K-feldspar and mica (Rösel & Zack, 2022; Woods 2016). K-phases are also amenable to conventional Ar-Ar detrital geochronology. Campbell, I., et al., 2005. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 237, 402-432, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.043 Moecher, D., & Samson, S., 2006, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 247, 252–266, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.04.035 Rösel, D., & T. Zack, 2022. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 46.2, 143-168, doi: 10.1111/ggr.12414. Woods, G. 2016. Agilent Application Note. Agilent Technologies, Cheadle.

Accessory Minerals and Trace Element Modelling

Geology from Aeromagnetic Data by Peter Betts

Australia’s Geological History: Rocks, Life And Tectonic Forces | SLICE SCIENCE | FULL DOC

Geochronothermobarometry - new methods for in situ dating of garnet.

AJ Styles On Retirement, Gunther, Hall Of Fame, John Cena, One More Match?

Why Sperm Whales Are The Most TERRIFYING Apex Predator On Earth

Jfrog | Jfrog Artifactory | Jfrog Artifactory Tutorial | Artifactory Tutorial | Intellipaat

Helicopter! - Alaska Geology Series

Big Pharma's Trillion Dollar Deception on Mental Health | Joanna Moncrief

309: Can the US Actually Make Solar Panels Again?

Something Enormous Is Waking Up Under The Bismarck Sea — And It's Dangerous

Germany's Flying Anti-Tank Gun | Henschel Hs 129

An Unusual Earthquake Just Shook Texas—Scientists Are Investigating

SBC Session 283: Evaluating NOAA's Rapid Refresh Forecast System-Smoke Model (2025 U.S. & Canada)

Civilization #END: The Decline and Fall of the American Empire

Unravelling the stages of oceanic serpentinisation: insights from trace elements and O and B (...)

Heterogeneity in deep-water deposits: Implications for subsurface characterization and prediction

Gold, Faults and Fluids

Multidisciplinary investigations on the relationships between deformation and metamorphism (...)

