Prosecutor Alan Jackson OWNS world-renowned Forensic Pathologist - Phil Spector Trial

Dr. Werner Spitz, a forensic pathologist, is cross-examined by Alan Jackson regarding his expert opinions on the final moments of Lana Clarkson's life. 00:00:00 - Preview 00:03:30 - Cross Examination Day 1 - July 26, 2007 00:16:22 - "The facts don't lie to me." 00:28:23 - Cross Examination Day 2 - July 27, 2007 00:38:30 - Fashion Physics 01:02:45 - Kennedy's Magic Bullet 01:16:53 - Passive Player The questioning scrutinizes Dr. Spitz's methodology, the physical evidence he considered (like GSR on hands, blood spatter, and the nature of the gunshot wound), and the conclusions he drew about Spector's involvement and Clarkson's actions. The cross-examination also challenges Dr. Spitz on omitted evidence, his financial compensation from the defense, and Phillip Spector's history with women and firearms. Objectivity and Re-evaluation: Dr. Spitz states that an objective forensic pathologist must consider "all the facts." When challenged with a hypothetical that "if the physical evidence suggested that Phillip Spector was in fact close enough to have fired the weapon," he initially stated he "would have to reconsider my opinions." However, he later presented a pre-prepared list, claiming it was a "regurgitation of what I knew before I even put pen to paper," essentially an affirmation of his original opinion rather than a true re-evaluation based on new hypothetical facts. Dr. Spitz largely dismisses the significance of numerous circumstantial facts that point to Phillip Spector's culpability, including his history with guns and women, his actions immediately after the shooting (wiping hands, moving clothes, not calling for help), and his direct statement admitting to the crime. Other courtCHOPT Playlists: Kevin Spacey Trial:    • Kevin Spacey Trial - Alan Jackson Defense ...   CA v Phil Spector:    • Prosecutor Alan Jackson - Phil Spector Tri...   MA v Aidan Kearney:    • Gaetani v Aidan Kearney - Turtleboy Civil ...   MA v Brian Walshe:    • Finding Ana Walshe   CT v Raul Valle:    • Jury DIDN'T SEE This - Video Answer to the...   UT v Kouri Richins:    • Kouri Richins Trial - Lead Investigator O'...   FL v Donna Adelson:    • Donna Adelson Trial - Day 4 - FULL day CON...