Case Summary: Bourhill v Young [1943]- House of Lords' decision-tort law-negligence-duty of care.

This video is a case summary of Bourhill v Young [1943]. I explain the facts of the case, the arguments put forward by the plaintiff and the defendant and the decision reached in the House of Lords. 00:00 Introduction 00:16 The facts of Bourhill v Young [1943] 01:09 What was the plaintiff's argument in Bourhill v Young [1943]? 01:57 What was the House of Lords' decision in Bourhill v Young [1943]? What to watch next: How does a secondary victim of psychiatric injury get damages in tort law?    • How does a secondary victim of psychiatric...   Playlist on pure psychiatric harm in English tort law. (This playlist includes videos which explain cases on psychiatric harm in English tort law.)    • Primary and Secondary Victims- Psychiatric...   It also includes case summaries on the following cases: Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992], McLoughlin v O’Brian [1983], Page v Smith [1996], Dulieu v White & Sons [1901], Victorian Railway Commissioners v Coultas (1888) and White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1999]. Playlist on negligence cases:    • Facts of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)   Read my blogs on pure psychiatric harm in English tort law https://www.lawwithdenise.com/blog?ca... Keywords: negligence tort law,duty of care negligence,bourhill v young 1943,bourhill vs young case,tort law,english law,psychiatric injury,psychiatric harm,primary and secondary victim,foundation law,nervous shock,a level law, bourhill vs young case,bourhill v young 1943,negligence,negligence tort law,psychiatric harm,pure psychiatric harm,english tort law,case summary,law with denise,duty of care negligence,duty of care tort law,foundation law,llb,nervous shock,primary and secondary victims,psychiatric injury,psychiatric injury tort law uk,tort law