Tort Law - Psychiatric Harm
Due to societal changes in the perception and understanding of mental illness there is now less reticence by the courts to award damages for psychiatric harm. Nevertheless this type of injury must be recognised medically and go beyond mere grief. Claimants are split between primary and secondary victims. A primary victim is one who suffers psychiatric harm after being physically injured/put in fear of injury (Page v Smith [1996]) but this zone of danger is interpreted in a narrow fashion (Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co Ltd [2006]). The definition has been expanded in some circumstances to include, for example, rescuers (White v CC of S Yorkshire [1999]). Secondary victims are witnesses to an injury/situation where a person is put in fear of injury but have to met four criteria before being able to successfully claim: Not be overly susceptible to psychiatric harm Bourhill v Young [1983] Jaensch v Coffey [1984] Have suffered the harm through shock North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] Have been in physical proximity of the accident/aftermath “direct, immediate perception” – Alcock v CC of S Yorkshire [1992] Have enjoyed a close personal/familial relationship with the victim Extended to fiancés in Alcock but not to rescuers – White v CC of S Yorkshire [1999]. Certain relationships create a duty of care as regards psychiatric harm: Commercial relationship: Attia v British Gas [1988] Solicitor/client: Al-Kandari v Brown [1980] Schools/children: X v Bedfordshire CC [1995] Doctor/Patient: Re. Organ Retention Group Litigation [2004] The employer/employee relationship can give rise to a duty but it is dependent on the context and the task that is being undertaken. An important series of cases on the subject of psychiatric harm involved the Hillsborough disaster and the litigation that followed. Physical harm is normally self-evident but requires a context specific inquiry into social perceptions of damage (MacFarlane v Tayside Health Board [2000]). Pure economic loss is entirely financial in nature.

Tort Law - Duty of Care

Psychiatric injury in the law of tort

Work-Related Psychiatric Injury in Extraordinary Times

Intentional infliction of emotional distress legal definition

Introduction to Psychiatric Injury | Law of Tort

How does a primary victim establish a case for damages for psychiatric harm in tort law?

The Life of a Case (2018)

Nuisance laws summary

Emotional Distress Torts

Episode 1.2: An Overview of Tort Law – Intentional Torts, Negligence, and Strict Liability

Billionaire's WARNING: I'm SELLING. The Crash Is Already Here!

Episode 1.1: What is Torts? And what Torts is not.

Causation # 1 - 'But For'

Tort Law: The Rules of Private Nuisance

Answering Rylands scenario questions

Understand Tort Law in 17 Minutes (Part I)

Psychiatric Injury | Law of Tort Full Lecture

Tort Special Duty Situations - Occupiers Liability Act 1984

Pure Economic Loss | Law of Tort

