What BIAS exists in the Peer review system?

The peer review system is a cornerstone of academic publishing, but is it truly impartial? In this video, we delve into the biases that exist within the peer review system, exploring how they can impact the publication of research and the careers of academics. From confirmation bias to implicit bias, we examine the various forms of bias that can influence the peer review process, and discuss the potential consequences for the scientific community. By shedding light on these biases, we hope to spark a conversation about how to improve the peer review system and promote a more equitable and transparent approach to academic publishing. Whether you're a researcher, academic, or simply interested in the world of science, this video is for you. Tune in to learn more about the biases in the peer review system and join the discussion on how to create a fairer and more inclusive academic environment. My friend and colleague Dr. Mahadeo Sukhai is the world’s first congenitally blind geneticist. He is proof that individuals who are differently abled can be successful in STEM. To confirm my thoughts from the video. Yes, Percivall Potts hypothesized that chimney sweeps had an increase on scrotal cancer. Bradford Hill worked with Richard Doll (the British lung cancer and smoking research). Ernst Wydner and Evarts Graham (the smoker) were the Americans who actually published their paper first. Subtitles in English available. Follow me: www.EduKatedSTEM.com Twitter, Bluesky and Instagram @EduKatedSTEM Patreon and Facebook - EduKatedSTEM Follow Mahadeo: https://www.idea-stem.ca/ LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube ⁨@ideastemcanada⁩ Music: www.bensound.com