The Psychological Reasons Statistics Training Is So Bad
Statistics teaching often fails for a psychological reason: humans learn through stories (frameworks), and they defend those stories by filtering evidence. That same mechanism makes “decision-tree stats” feel like arbitrary rules to students, and it makes instructors resistant to switching to a model-first approach. I demo the same analysis two ways and run a few quick experiments to show the story-defense system in action. To see my videos about stories in psychology, see • Persuasion as Story To get 20% off, use coupon code christmas_simplistics_20 To take my new February simplistics class, see: https://simplistics.net/course/simpli... To take my live mixed models class in January, see: https://simplistics.net/course/introd... For the self-guided Mixed Models course: https://simplistics.net/course/mixed/ For the self-guided visualization course: https://simplistics.net/course/random... For the self-guided simplistics course: https://simplistics.net/course/univar... For the self-guided R course: https://simplistics.net/course/introd... For other classes, see: https://simplistics.net/all-courses/ For consulting, see: https://simplistics.net/product/stati...

Can p-values read your mind? How about Bayesian Statistics?

Can I Relearn Time Series Fast With a PhD?

The Geometry of Expected Values

What statistics teachers get wrong!

Simple slopes analysis is dumb

Why Smart People Lose At Office Politics

Why We’re All Bayesians

Psychology of People With Extremely High IQ

Why AI Has Failed to Take Your Job Since 1976

The End of an Era

Why a Good Fit Doesn’t Mean Your Model Is Right

How bad is it? Critiquing a logistic regression study

PhD Success Isn't About Intelligence | It's About This

The Hidden Geometry Behind Hypothesis Testing

Is statistics bad for science?

🇩🇪 German industry JUST died (it’s WORSE than you think)

How bad is it? Critiquing a Mixed Model Study

The hidden science of being liked, trusted, and remembered | Vanessa Van Edwards: Full Interview

Explaining the biggest “beef” in statistics | Bayesian #2

