なぜキャバクラは経費で、育児費は自腹なのか│4兆円産業と60年変わらない税法の闇

Spending hundreds of thousands of yen at a hostess club after work is deductible with just one receipt. However, the cost of babysitting while working late at night is not deductible at all. Why is there such a huge difference in treatment for expenses that are both "work-related"? ───────────────────────── ▼ Timestamps 00:00 Opening 00:44 Ch.1 The Reality of Entertainment Expenses 02:33 Ch.2 Conditions for Expenses to Be Deductible 04:18 Ch.3 The True Nature of Practices 06:06 Ch.4 Why Babysitting Expenses Are Not Deductible 07:54 Ch.5 Entertainment Culture and Structural Exclusion 09:48 Ch.6 Comparison of System Designs 11:18 Ending ───────────────────────── ▼ Related Videos    • 3組に1組が離婚する日本│結婚より難しい「続けること」の真実【熟年・養育費・法改正ま...      • 男の独身は本当に勝ち組なのか？│自由・お金・寿命…6つのデータが示す不都合な真実   ───────────────────────── ▼ References and Data Sources National Tax Agency, "Non-Deductible Entertainment Expenses System" Ministry of Finance, "Article 61-4 of the Special Taxation Measures Act" National Tax Agency, "Actual Situation of Corporate Enterprises as Seen from Tax Statistics (FY2023)" Cabinet Office, "White Paper on Gender Equality (2023 Edition)" Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, "Basic Survey on Employment Equality" OECD Family Database (family support spending, as a percentage of GDP) Cabinet Office, "Support Project for Users of Company-Led Babysitters" ───────────────────────── ▼Related Tags #Tax System #Entertainment Expenses #Babysitter #Female Managers #Expenses #Social Issues #Data Visualization #Diagrammatic Data Society ───────────────────────── Software Used: VOICEVOX × Ryusei Aoyama