Antonio Marte plantea eliminar Intrant y Digesett por fracaso del tránsito | Libremente VTV

Antonio Marte's statements have reopened the debate on the traffic crisis in the Dominican Republic, as he proposes eliminating institutions that were created precisely to regulate and improve mobility in the country. The legislator questions the effectiveness of the National Institute of Transit and Land Transportation and the General Directorate of Traffic and Land Transportation Safety, arguing that traffic chaos continues to worsen despite the resources, regulations, and structures created in recent years. The discussion also brings to the forefront the enforcement of Law 63-17, a law that many consider modern and sufficient, but whose application remains one of the system's main challenges. Beyond eliminating institutions, the debate revolves around a fundamental question: Is the problem the lack of laws and agencies, or the absence of political will to enforce traffic laws on Dominican streets?