Filioque Debate: Ubi Petrus vs. Militant Thomist
A debate between Militant Thomist (Christian B. Wagner) and Ubi Petrus on the Filioque clause, which was one of the major occasions for the schism between the RCC and the OC. Militant Thomist believes that the position of the Greek Fathers, as interpreted by Florence and the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity study is not a church-dividing issue. By contrast, Ubi Petrus believes that the Filioque is unhistorical and carries with it a theology that is contrary to the patristic teaching. Militant Thomist's YT: / disputedquestions Militant Thomist's Twitter: / militantthomist Ubi Petrus' SubscribeStare: https://www.subscribestar.com/ubi-petrus

▶︎
Is the Orthodox Church the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church? Ubi Petrus vs. Voice of Reason

▶︎
Filioque Debate David Erhan Vs. Scholastic Answers

▶︎
Orthodox Catechumens Must Read These Books

▶︎
Papal Infallibility, Pope St. Leo the Great, & the Council of Chalcedon | Erick Ybarra Rebutted

▶︎
Monarchical Trinity VS Thomistic Trinity: Which View Prevails?

▶︎
Mike Winger’s DISGUSTING BLASPHEMY…

▶︎
Are the Copts Orthodox? Who are the Nestorians?

▶︎
The HEATED Ubi vs. Voice of Reason Debate

▶︎
Orthodox vs. Catholic Debate: the Pope in the 1st Millenium | Collorafi vs. Ubi Petrus

▶︎
Jay Dyer Reviews Ybarra vs Ubi Petrus Debate

▶︎
CAPPADOCIANS Destroy JAY DYER

▶︎
Papal Forgeries: A Road to Schism (F

▶︎
An Explanation and Defense of the Filioque (Intro to Trinitarian Theology)

▶︎
Jay Dyer's Debate with Catholic Scholars UNRAVELS… (Full Breakdown)

▶︎
Vindicating the Filioque: Fr. Thomas Crean, OP & Erick Ybarra

▶︎
The Dating Problem in the Orthodox Church

▶︎
Jay Dyer Reviews Ubi Petrus VS Voice Of Reason Debate

▶︎
Anthony Rogers@Ousias1 Vs Sean Griffin@KingdomInContext: Does the Father Have a Literal Body? EP 297

▶︎
Sedevacantism Debate: Are John XXIII Through Francis True Popes? Jeff Cassman Vs Br. Peter Dimond

▶︎
