Neo-Calvinism vs. The Bible 051. Romans 4:5. Dr. Andy Woods. 11-30-25.

ROMANS 4:5 • DR. ANDY WOODS • NOVEMBER 30, 2025 • NEO-CALVINISM VS THE BIBLE Summary of [PowerPoint NeoCal-51 1. Purpose and Structure • The deck critically examines Neo-Calvinism, especially the doctrine of “Perseverance of the Saints,” comparing Calvinist theology with biblical teachings. • It explores the origins of Calvin’s theology, his life, and the influence of Augustine. 2. TULIP and Calvinism • The presentation runs through the five points of Calvinism (TULIP): Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints. • Special focus is given to “Perseverance of the Saints,” highlighting Calvinist definitions, examples, and perceived problems. 3. Critique of Perseverance of the Saints • The deck argues that Calvinism’s assurance of salvation is based more on the believer’s faithfulness than on God’s keeping power, leading to uncertainty about ultimate salvation. • It cites various theologians and historical examples to show that Calvinist teaching can undermine assurance and foster anxiety about salvation1. 4. Biblical Assurance of Salvation • Contrasts Calvinist views with biblical passages that emphasize assurance through faith alone (e.g., 1 John 5:13, John 3:16, Romans 4:5). • Argues that salvation is conditioned on faith alone (sola fide), not on continual perseverance or works. 5. Problems Identified • Claims Calvinist perseverance leads to: • Unbiblical views of final salvation • Support from out-of-context verses • A subtle form of works-based salvation • Less emphasis on sanctification and the Bema Seat • Destruction of assurance of salvation1 6. Theological and Historical Commentary • Includes quotes from Calvin, Chafer, MacArthur, Piper, White, and others to illustrate differing views on faith, assurance, and perseverance. • Notes historical anxiety among Calvinist theologians about their own salvation. 7. Grammatical Analysis • Discusses the use of present tense participles in biblical Greek, arguing that continual belief is not always required for salvation. 8. Conclusion • The deck concludes that Calvinism imposes philosophical ideas onto Scripture, distorting biblical teaching about assurance and salvation. • Urges readers to base their understanding of salvation on Scripture alone, not on theological systems1.