مقارنه الافضل ب الافضل 🔥 بيجو 405 مع الشاهين و الدوجان .

From the series “Which is better?” Focus on the obituaries because this video will be about two cars that changed the fate of the car market with huge sales percentages and achieved strong spread. The two cars are the Shahin or Dogan, whether Turkish or manufactured elsewhere, and the Peugeot 405, French, Egyptian, or Iranian. As usual, the first comparison will be in terms of fuel economy. In terms of fuel consumption, the Peugeot 405 is superior, consuming between 7 and 10 liters per 100 km, while the Shahin or Dogan consumes between 8 and 11 liters. As for maintenance and operating costs, the two are very close in numbers, but the Shahin may have a slight edge, and the rating would be in its favor with an 8 out of 10, compared to the Peugeot 7. Both are very suitable for families, especially with the spacious trunk and interior seating. Both can accommodate five people, but the Peugeot has a slight edge in this area, especially in the rear seats. The rating would be the Peugeot with an 8 out of 10 and the Shahin with a 7 out of 10. Design Here, the Peugeot 405's design is clearly superior to the Shahin or the Dogan, as the Shahin's polygonal design is old and not entirely modern for our time. However, the Peugeot 405, even if its design is relatively old, is more in line with the Shahin, especially with modifications. Its appearance is distinctive, so the rating will be in its favor with a 6 out of 10, while the Shahin gets a 4. Durability and suspension systems, whether the Dogan or the Peugeot, are both characterized by their durability and the durable chassis, but there is a difference here depending on the model and country of manufacture. I mean, the modern models of the Shahin, with Turkish or European manufacturing, are naturally better, more reliable, and more durable than the Egyptian models, which were widespread under the name Nasr. The same system is with the 405, so the French models are better than the Iranian models or those gathered here in Egypt. But in general, let's agree that with the difference in models, the evaluation will differ. In general, in my opinion, it will be relatively equal and without numbers depending on the model between the two, knowing that the suspension of both is durable and has the same steel system. Reliability: You noticed what I told you regarding durability and system, and the difference between the two models depending on the version and country of manufacture. It is the same system with reliability. So, the Dogan is definitely better than all the Shahin models in reliability, and the Shahin models are newer, the more reliable they are. Compare this to the Peugeot models. The French 405 is much better than the Iranian and Egyptian models, because you will find problems with the Egyptian models, including overheating. As for the Nasr models from the Shahin, you will find a lack of reliability in the mechanical parts and you will find them breaking down quickly. However, in any case, in my opinion, the Peugeot is better in reliability than the Shahin. However, I exclude in this matter the Egyptian or Iranian models, as the evaluation is also without numbers, depending on the model you will use. For example, if we compare the Dogan and Shahin Turkish-made models with the French Peugeot models, the evaluation will be close and may be in favor of the Peugeot. As for the Shahin Egyptian-made, for example, the Peugeot is also Egyptian-made or Iranian-made, so the evaluation may be in favor of the Shahin due to overheating problems. Acceleration: Here I will tell you about the total models with approximate numbers. For example, the 405 in its versions accelerates from zero to 100 in approximately 10 or 13 seconds, depending on the speed. Maximum speed is 160 to 170 km/h, while the Sahin or the Dogan reach approximately 12 to 14 seconds, with a maximum speed of 180 km/h. This is also an approximate number, and frankly, it is not logical, so the rating will be in favor of the Peugeot, with a 6 out of 10. I give the Shahin or the Dogan a 5. Driving experience. In any case, the Peugeot will be significantly superior to the Sahin or the Dogan, due to the ease of driving and flexibility you will find while driving in narrow streets, better handling of bumps and bumps, ease of steering and steering control. However, the Dogan, given that it has power steering, is much better at steering on highways. Therefore, the Peugeot will be clearly superior. This is because the Sahin and Dogan are high off the ground and their height is not appropriate for their weight, so there is no balance at all, unlike the Peugeot, which you will find more balance and comfort at speeds, and the rating will be in its favor with 6 out of 10, while the Shahin is 4. Equipment and safety features: Of course, both do not understand the equipment that will amaze you like many cars from the nineties and early two thousandths, and the same system in safety features is also modest, but both, as I ment...