When Good Adaptations Get it Wrong: Pride and Prejudice 2005 vs. 1995.
Sometimes good films deviate from their source material in annoying ways. The 2005 adaptation of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice by Joe Wright does a lot of stuff right — it's gorgeous, the cast is great, etc., but there are reasons why it suffers when compared to 1995's BBC adaptation by Andrew Davies. Hat tip to @EllieDashwood, whose great comparison video inspired this one: • Pride and Prejudice 1995 vs 2005 Comparison
▶︎
Pride and Prejudice (1995): 15 INSANE Facts You Never Knew
▶︎
Pride and Prejudice (1995): 11 Weird Facts You Didn’t Know!
▶︎
The Other Bennet Sister Gets Mary Bennet Right
▶︎
Therapist Reacts to PRIDE AND PREJUDICE
▶︎
Every Jane Austen Adaptation Ranked from Worst to Best
▶︎
THIS Scene Reveals Why Joffrey HAD To Die
▶︎
How Lizzy Caught Mr Darcy's Eye | Attraction in Jane Austen's Novels, Countenance & Regency Beauty
▶︎
RomComs Died Because Falling In Love Became Cringe...
▶︎
How Peter Jackson and Lord of the Rings Broke the Oscars
▶︎
Pride & Prejudice (2005): 16 Weird Facts You Didn't Know!
▶︎
Pride & Prejudice (1995) Things You Might Have Missed
▶︎
Every Jane Austen Adaptation, Ranked from Worst to Best
▶︎
Why Mary Bennet embarrassed her family | Regency Era Etiquette, Propriety & Feminine Ideals
▶︎
PRIDE & PREJUDICE Press Conference (2005) | TIFF REWIND
▶︎
why 90s rom-coms feel more romantic than modern love stories
▶︎
My Bonnet Year: Pride and Prejudice 1967
▶︎
Why Pride and Prejudice Can Never Be Fully Adapted
▶︎
Yea... no wonder it won 17 Oscars
▶︎
THIS Scene Is A Masterclass In Psychological Manipulation
▶︎