《高嶺鐵衛》總監低頭！終於承認不好玩，玩家才是對的！

Shut down after just 45 days. Two million players jumped in, yet the game couldn’t retain them. Was the failure of Highguard really just because players “don’t understand competitive games”?Backend data released by the game director tells a different story: 92% of players completed the tutorial, and the average session lasted 91 minutes. The narrative of “review bombing” and “player resistance culture” instantly falls apart. Players actually gave the game enough patience and opportunity — it simply failed to give them a reason to stay.With backing from a major publisher, strong industry connections, and exposure on a TGA-level stage, this collapse feels even more glaring. The gamble of live-service games is shifting from what used to be a high win-rate strategy into something closer to betting on a single number in roulette.In this episode, we’ll discuss whether this shutdown will make the industry finally hit the brakes on this road to self-destruction. 00:00 Starstrike 2.0 01:35 Director Releases Data and Admits Failure 05:27 Indie Game? Give Me a Break! 06:11 Well-Funded Yet Completely Shattered 07:49 Live-Service Games Are a Gamble 10:58 Will Executives Hit the Brakes? My X: @ChannelOLD9 https://x.com/ChannelOLD9