Voice Referendum - do we need to limit the scope of representations made by the Voice?
If the Voice referendum succeeds in Australia, it will give the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice the function of making representations to the Parliament and the Executive Government on 'matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples'. Is this too broad and should it be limited to matters 'directly affecting' Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples? This video explains why the choice was made to avoid legal constraints and instead rely on political constraints to keep the Voice focused on matters of importance to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

▶︎
Voice and Recognition - should there be one referendum question or two?

▶︎
Changing the Constitution by interpretation - The Engineers case

▶︎
Jon Stewart on Trump's "Meritocracy" & Desi Lydic on MAGA Moving Iran Goalposts | The Daily Show

▶︎
How to Restore a Broken Relationship

▶︎
Clara Mattei: capitalism is not natural - it’s enforced

▶︎
Indigenous Voice Constitutional Amendment - Product Review

▶︎
Prof. John Mearsheimer: 250 Years of American Foreign Policy

▶︎
11 Symptoms of Dangerous B12 Deficiency (Even If Tests Say You’re Fine)

▶︎
Nobody Explained Maxwell's Equations Like THIS!

▶︎
What are some of the key issues facing Australia? - World Questions podcast, BBC World Service

▶︎
Why Capitalism Needs You to Lose | Richard Wolff & Clara Mattei

▶︎
Stop Hair Loss NOW! SHOCKING Tips from Barbara O'Neill You Need to Know!

▶︎
One Nation's citizens-initiated referendums policy

▶︎
When laws conflict, which one prevails?

▶︎
Why is Ukraine the West's Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer

▶︎
Why world leaders keep heading to Beijing

▶︎
Count Binface, the Chiltern Hundreds and UK electoral eccentricities

▶︎
Tax Time 2026: The ATO's Key Tips and Focus Areas

▶︎
The challenge by 'White Australia' to the prohibited hate group law

▶︎
