Recursive language models, explained (the idea under Claude "ultracode")
On May 28th, 2026, Anthropic shipped "dynamic workflows" in Claude Code, switched on by a setting that sounds like a cheat code: ultracode. Flip it, hand the AI a big job, and it does something strange — it stops trying to answer you. Instead it writes a program, and that program spins up an army of copies of the AI: fifty, sometimes a few hundred, each on its own slice of the work, while the one in charge runs the whole operation from code and never even holds most of what comes back. People can't agree whether it's the biggest leap in a year or an expensive way to burn money — but that argument isn't the interesting part. This video is about how it pulls the trick off at all: the MIT idea underneath it, recursive language models — stop feeding the model your data, leave it in a variable, and make it write code to reach in for only the scraps it needs. We walk through why one overloaded context window "rots," the company-org-chart shape that fixes it (recursion is just a manager who's allowed to hire), the benchmark where the same models jump from basically zero to 76, why everyone's so careful with it (burned budgets, agents that hallucinate and then confirm each other), how one lab trained the skill into the model instead of prompting it, and when this is actually worth using. It ends on the shift it forces: you stop asking "how do I solve this?" and start asking "how would I structure a team to solve it?" If you want more under-the-hood breakdowns like this, subscribe — and tell me in the comments where you'd point an AI army first. Chapters 00:00 One AI writes a program that spawns an army of itself 00:50 "Isn't this just subagents?" — the one real difference 02:05 Recursive language models: stop feeding the model your data 02:58 Why one overloaded context rots — and the fix 05:01 The proof: same models, 0 → 76 06:18 It's everywhere — and why everyone's careful 07:43 Teaching the skill, and when to actually use it 09:12 The bigger shift: you draw the org chart Sources & further reading Anthropic — Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code (announcement) — https://claude.com/blog/introducing-d... Anthropic — A harness for every task: Dynamic Workflows — https://claude.com/blog/a-harness-for... Recursive Language Models — Alex Zhang's blog (with interactive trajectories) — https://alexzhang13.github.io/blog/20... Recursive Language Models (Zhang, Kraska, Khattab — MIT CSAIL), arXiv — https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24601 CodeWhale — the DeepSeek coding agent that wired RLM in, in the open — https://github.com/Hmbown/CodeWhale Kimi agent swarm + PARL (Moonshot), arXiv — https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02276

The Dumbest AI Trick That Actually Works

Zig says NO to AI

I figured out the best way to vibe code

I Was Right About AI

They knew about AI Agents all along!

Stop Prompting Claude. Start Loop Engineering.

The Simple Rule that BREAKS Mathematics

One Physicist Quietly Built the Tech Behind Local AI

I Made Opus 4.8 and Fable 5 Build the Same App (RAW RESULTS)

Finally. Agent Loops Clearly Explained.

The Claude Shutdown Is a Total Sh*tshow
![Yann LeCun's $1B Bet Against LLMs [Part 1]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kYkIdXwW2AE/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEjCNACELwBSFryq4qpAxUIARUAAAAAGAElAADIQj0AgKJDeAE=&rs=AOn4CLDbV4izF3i-wxevCVIn7FJjoy1vlA)
Yann LeCun's $1B Bet Against LLMs [Part 1]

What It Takes to Run an AI Model on Your Own Computer

Run This In Claude, It'll Make You Build 10x Faster.

Can an open-source AI really compete with Claude 3.5 Sonnet?

MIT Researchers Just Solved Context Rot

Mastering Claude Code in 30 minutes

Shocking New AI Just Hit 12 Million Tokens With 1000x Less Compute

What is happening at Meta?

