Ep 7: Who is watching the Watchers?
In Episode 7 of The Bar Card and the Breakdown of Justice, retired Judge Steven Teske examines a growing controversy that strikes at the heart of legal accountability and prosecutorial independence: Who watches the lawyers who wield the power of the state? At issue is a proposed Trump administration rule that would allow the Department of Justice to delay or interfere with state bar investigations into DOJ lawyers by asking state licensing authorities to pause ethics complaints while the Department conducts its own internal review. Critics argue the proposal would weaken one of the last truly independent checks on government lawyers. Judge Teske explains why that concern matters. Because lawyers are not licensed by presidents, political parties, or government agencies. They are licensed by independent state bars — entities empowered to investigate misconduct, impose discipline, suspend licenses, and, when necessary, disbar attorneys who violate professional ethics rules. This episode explores: • Why independent bar oversight matters • The constitutional dangers of allowing DOJ to “investigate itself” • How weakening external accountability erodes public trust • Why ethics complaints against government lawyers are increasing • And what happens when institutions begin treating oversight itself as the problem The episode also discusses: Proposed DOJ efforts to pause or interfere with state bar investigations The role of state bars as independent regulators of attorney conduct Ethics complaints involving senior DOJ officials Concerns raised by former DOJ officials and legal ethics experts The danger of replacing independent oversight with internal review Why experienced prosecutors fear risking their “bar card” The broader pattern of attacking courts, watchdogs, and oversight mechanisms Judge Teske also examines a troubling institutional pattern: When judges push back, they are attacked. When watchdogs investigate, they are weakened. When ethics boards inquire, oversight is moved “in-house.” “At some point, the message stops being subtle. The problem isn’t bad oversight. The problem is oversight.” This episode asks a constitutional question as old as democracy itself: If the people exercising extraordinary government power are no longer subject to independent review… who watches the watchers? #TheTeskeBrief #JusticeReDesigned #DOJ #LegalEthics #RuleOfLaw #DepartmentOfJustice #BarCard #JudicialIndependence #Constitution #DueProcess #ProsecutorialMisconduct #FederalCourts #JusticeSystem

Ep. 8: The prosecutor's Dilemma

Ep. 6: When Interpretation Replaces Evidence

Donald Trump's NBC Interview - Psychiatrist Analyses

America’s Jury System TERRIFIES Me

She was FIRED by Trump's DOJ. She's NOT stopping the pursuit of justice

How My Uncle’s Con Is Fully Exposed: Mary Trump | The Daily Beast Podcast

Episode 8: Fixing the Accountability Gap: What Congress—and the States—Can Do Now

The Brutal EXECUTION of Benito Mussolini Is HARD to Stomach!

Ep 4 Minneapolis Under Siege: Officer-Created Danger, Escalation, and the Freeze Frame is Gone

Epstein files release sent White House into CRISIS MODE: Report

Ep 4: The Rules They Swore to Follow

Woran Trump und Putin gerade scheitern – Analyse mit Militärökonom Keupp I ZDFheute live

Europe is on the path to oblivion - Yanis Varoufakis & Wolfgang Munchau | The Econoclasts

Series Introduction: The Bar Card and the Breakdown of Justice

Lawrence: Vance knew Epstein Files were ‘a huge problem’

Trump’s US attorney HUMILIATED on national TV

Why Trump's Boundless Ego Is Sabotaging Him: Wolff | Inside Trump's Head

Ep 1 Minneapolis Under Siege: Facts, Myths, and Federal Power

This is why Trump is so hard to interview | About That

