PREOT CONTRA NEDREPTATE, GODINĂ VS TANASĂ, ȚEPE DIN JURUL BEACH, PLEASE!

Ti-a placut? Poti sustine contentul de acest tip (si plata avocatilor) pe: Patreon:   / janghinaro   Revolut: @georgiyspe Gasesti toate investigatiile si pe: https://janghina.ro/ Iar pe mine ma gasesti pe: TWITCH:   / janghinaro   INSTAGRAM:   / janghina_ro   TIKTOK:   / janghinaro   DISCORD:   / discord   00:00:00 - 00:03:10 - INTRO 00:03:10 - 00:04:35 - SALUT CHATUL ȘI E CALD 00:04:35 - 00:13:30 - NU MAI POȚI IEȘI ÎN CLUB? 00:13:30 - 01:01:00 - SFATURI DUHOVNICEȘTI CONTRA NEDREPTĂȚII 01:01:00 - 01:06:12 - TI SI OKEAN ȘI HRĂNIREA URȘILOR 01:06:12 - 01:25:20 - TESTIMONIALE ANTREPRENOR AI 01:25:20 - 01:56:55 - GODINĂ RECLAMAT DE "BOVIN CU CRAVATĂ" 01:56:55 - 02:01:15 - AI ȘI MINTE FASCINANTĂ 02:01:15 - 02:33:20 - ȚEPELE DIN JURUL BEACH, PLEASE! 02:33:20 - 02:59:45 - BRAND PERSONAL "PROFITABIL" 02:59:45 - 03:19:40 - DIN CORPORAȚIE LA 1500 RON/ZI 03:19:40 - 03:30:20 - AMINTIRI DESPRE ANTREPRENOARELE DIN ANII '90 03:30:20 - 03:33:20 - OUTRO #liveromania #divertisment #romania #janghina #janghinaro Legal disclaimers: The European Court of Human Rights has emphasized in its jurisprudence that "given the significant role of the Internet in expanding public access to news and facilitating information sharing, the function of bloggers and influential social media users can be likened to that of 'public watchdogs'" (ECHR, CASE OF MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY, 8th of November 2016, par. 168). In light of this, my online activity, including the content that I produce and share on this YouTube channel, can reasonably be considered journalistic in nature. My work serves a similar purpose to traditional journalism in informing the public and holding public figures accountable. "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use." "No copyright infringement intended" "I do not own the music" "I don't take credit for music". "Made for satirical purposes only, no copyright infringement intended" In addition to YouTube policies, the Romanian legislation, journalistic investigation materials like this cannot be suspected of violating copyrights. Specifically, Article 7 of Law no. 190/2018 regarding measures for the implementation of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) provides protection for materials of this kind, highlighting the importance of free expression and the right to information in our society. Article 9 of Law 8/1996 on copyright and related rights stipulates that: "The following cannot benefit from legal copyright protection: e) news and press information" and Article 35 of Law no. 8/1996 provides that: "(2) Under the conditions provided in paragraph (1), reproduction, distribution, broadcasting or communication to the public is permitted, without direct or indirect commercial or economic advantage: a) of short excerpts from press articles and radio or television reports, for the purpose of informing on current issues, except for those for which such use is expressly reserved"