The Gospels are Historically Reliable: 6 Reasons
Historical reliability must be properly defined in view of the conventions of ancient historiography. Mike Licona defines what it means to say an ancient historical work is "historically reliable" then provides 6 criteria that must be met in order for that work to be regarded in that sense. Mike Licona is Professor of New Testament Studies at Houston Christian University. HCU offers an accredited Master of Arts degree in apologetics that may be completed entirely online or on the HCU campus in Houston. For more information, visit https://bit.ly/2Wlej6Z. WEBSITE: https://www.risenjesus.com FACEBOOK: / michael.r.licona TWITTER: / drmikelicona Buy "The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus": https://amzn.to/38vTfNU Buy "The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach": https://amzn.to/2NOOZkT Buy "Paul Meets Muhammad": https://amzn.to/2RdEFoB Buy "Why Are There Differences in the Gospels?": https://amzn.to/36dzc5C If you like Mike's work, become a patron by visiting his new Patreon page at / risenjesus #gospelsreliable
A Closer Look on The Resurrection of Jesus.
How was the Old Testament Canon Formed?
Timothy McGrew - The Historical Reliabilty of the Gospels
Are the Gospels Historically Reliable? The Problem of Contradictions
Debunking Contradictions: Inside Mike Licona's New Book on Gospels differences.
The Gospels Are History Not Myth
Did Jesus claim to be God?
How was the New Testament Canon Formed? (Part 1 of 2)
Why The Bible Is Reliable - Dr. Frank Turek
Historical Reliability of the Gospels - Craig Blomberg
When was the Gospel of Mark written?
Did Jesus Rise From the Dead? Dr. Mike Licona
The Jesus of Revelation Is Evil — Bart D. Ehrman Explains
Greek Manuscripts of the New Testament
Who wrote the Gospel of Mark?
The "Q" Gospel | Clearly Explained
How was the New Testament Canon Formed? (Part 2 of 2)
Bart Ehrman debates Peter J Williams, are the Gospels Historically Reliable?
Why are there Differences in the Gospels?
