Lee Carbine: Gunmaking is not for the Faint of Heart
James Paris Lee is known today as the inventor of the detachable box magazine, and the “Lee” in the “Lee Enfield” rifle system - a very significant contributor to firearms development. His first foray into the business of gun design and manufacture, however, was a rather ignominious failure. Lee patented a single shot swinging barrel system in 1862, and hoped to win an Army contract for it. In February of 1864 he submitted a rifle version to the Army, and was promptly rejected - the Army was not interested in breechloading rifles. Lee came right back in April 1864 with a carbine pattern, and this was accepted for testing - the Army was indeed looking for breechloading cavalry carbines. It took a full year, but in April 1865 the Army came back and gave Lee a contract for 1,000 carbines at $18 each. Lee rounded up investors and capital, and created the Lee Fire Arms Company in Milwaukee to produce the guns. His first two samples were delivered in January 1866 - in .42 rimfire caliber. At this point, there is some disagreement. Lee claims that his sample guns in .42 caliber were accepted, and thus his followup delivery of .42 caliber carbines should have been accepted. The government said that the contract specified .44 rimfire caliber, and his delivery of .42 caliber guns was unacceptable, and thus rejected. A court case would ensue, but with the rejection of the first 250 guns and the cancellation of their contract, the company had to look hard and fast for a backup plan. In March 1867 newspaper ads were placed in Milwaukee for sporting rifles and carbines from the Lee company. The parts planned for military production were used instead for civilian guns in a variety of configurations - carbines, light rifles, and heavy rifles in several barrel lengths and several calibers. By 1868 all production had ceased, and the Lee Fire Arms Company dissolved. James Lee returned to his former profession of watchmaking, but this experience with gun manufacturing would not keep him deterred for long. By 1872 he was back working with Remington, and would go on the produce the designs that we know him for today. The lessons of this rifle? Firearms manufacturing is a risky business, not for the faint of heart. And also, sometimes you can learn from a difficult experience to do better the second time. / forgottenweapons Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com

Remington Split Breech - Before It Was Famous

Fenian Needham Conversion: Just the Thing for Invading Canada

Woran Trump und Putin gerade scheitern – Analyse mit Militärökonom Keupp I ZDFheute live

The Ljutic Space Gun (Repost: YouTube cut)

The BRILLIANT Inventor Who Turned A Food Van Into Britain's Deadliest Desert Weapon !

FN's New ARKA: Revamping the SCAR for Military Tenders

The Greene Carbine: Too Tricky for the Cavalry

Guns That Killed Racists (feat. InRangeTV)

Ian vs Karl vs. Admin: What's the Best Militia Rifle?

Morse Carbine: If the Army Says No, Sell it Commercially!

From Bolt Action Lee to LMG: The Charlton Automatic Rifle

Was this gun the first British bolt action rifle? With weapons and firearms expert Jonathan Ferguson

Swiss Straight Pulls 8: 1908/1909 Trials Leading To GP11 And The 1911 Series

What is the REAL Right Way to Fire Two Guns at Once?

The Dark Reason the Lee-Enfield Is Still in Service

Was Matilda II the BEST Tank of WWII?

Weapons of the Civil War Cavalry: The Spencer Carbine

Musgrave 9mm: A Gun for the Black Market

Why was the Enfield Revolver such a huge flop? With firearms and weapon expert, Jonathan Ferguson

