Richard III: The Sources - The Problem With More
Sir Thomas More has, for centuries, been used as almost a primary source on for the story of Richard III and the Princes in the Tower. This is a mistake. More never meant us to use his work this way. That's why he didn't finish it or publish it. What was More really writing? What did he mean by his work? What about the latest evidence that More might have been correct? All is not what it seems.
▶︎
Richard III: The Sources - The Problem With The Urn
▶︎
Richard III: The Sources - The Problem With Mancini
▶︎
This Is What Brexit Cost the World
▶︎
Richard III - Identifying the Remains
▶︎
What were Tolkien's Oxford Students Reading in the 1930s?
▶︎
Trump wants to be ‘THE LAST PRESIDENT’ - Maggie Haberman
▶︎
King Arthur: What Everybody Gets Wrong
▶︎
Why Do Predators Ignore Sleeping Humans?
▶︎
Dan Snow Rates Portrayals of English Kings and Queens in Movies
▶︎
Richard Dawkins: AI, Memes, And Why I’m Angry About The Gender Debate
▶︎
Alastair Campbell and Jacob Rees-Mogg Debate Brexit | The Mishal Husain Show
▶︎
Who Was The Best English Monarch? David Mitchell Rates The Royals!
▶︎
Loyalty Binds Me: The Life of King Richard III Episode 04
▶︎
The Entire History of Paris in 37 Minutes
▶︎
The Rise and Fall of Thomas Cromwell│Henry VIII's Right Hand Man
▶︎
Christopher Hitchens interview on the Clintons (1999)
▶︎
The Battle of Barnet 14 April 1471
▶︎
Katja Hoyer — How the West Looked From Behind the Iron Curtain
▶︎
What Happened to the Habsburgs After Their Empire Collapsed?
▶︎