Nitro200 V Tornado280 Climb Test
Flight test comparing the difference in thrust ( climb rate ) between the AirConception Nitro 200 and the Tornado 200. Same parameters with a back to back 60 sec climb test performed at the same location on the same day in the same conditions by the same pilot. You can bench test a Paramotor's thrust potential but there are far too many parameters to get a solid result. The best way is to do it flying. Quoted weights include motor, Cage, Harness, Fuel Tank & Prop ready to fly Tornado was fitted with the XC head which does drop the top end revs and improves fuel efficiency according to the manufacturer

▶︎
A/C Tornado Test Flight

▶︎
AirConception Nitro 200 Unboxing and Assembly

▶︎
260614 Paragliding Portsea and Flinders Golf Course Victoria Australia

▶︎
The SR-71 Blackbird Was Untouchable. The Day Britain Proved Everyone Wrong

▶︎
Air conception nitro 200 crankcase gasket repair

▶︎
Test of the Niviuk Hiko P, Arrow P and Expe 80

▶︎
658kmh 408mph! | When everything just goes right

▶︎
Air Conception 280 3 Blade Prop VS 2 Blade Prop

▶︎
Paramotor Party Weekend Vid 3

▶︎
Flat top Paramotor

▶︎
Longest Paramotor Flight in the USA = 7 Hours 53 Minutes, 4.6 Gallons

▶︎
04-30-21 My last Air Conception Tornado 280 flight before it jumped time.

▶︎
2 YEAR REVIEW -- Air Conception Nitro 200 (The Good, Bad, & Ugly!)

▶︎
Air Conception 280 Extreme R

▶︎
Fulcrum PowerPod is the world's first paramotor pod harness with a ducted fan only 0.5 m in diameter

▶︎
Air Conception Nitro 200 / Tornado 280 clutch disassembly

▶︎
Engine Failure at 1300ft AGL, Morningstar ZA, Pioneer 300

▶︎
Latanko Dudek Warp2

▶︎
My Thoughts On Gas VS Electric Paramotors

▶︎
