Florida Appeals Journal 44: Artificial Intelligence and the law -- Researchers beware.
FLORIDA APPEALS JOURNAL™ JOURNAL ENTRY 44.2025 Recorded on September 8, 2025 #floridaappealsjournal #appeals #floridacivilappeals #artificialintelligence #chatgpt In this episode of Florida Appeals Journal, appellate attorney Jennifer S. Carroll explores the risks of relying on AI for legal research. With the rise of tools like ChatGPT, both lawyers and self-represented litigants are tempted by quick answers — but the courts are beginning to sanction misuse. Jennifer reviews two key cases: • Mata v. Avianca (S.D.N.Y. 2023) — known as the first “ChatGPT case,” where an attorney submitted fictitious case citations generated by AI and faced Rule 11 sanctions. • Garner v. Cadence (Utah Ct. App. 2025) — where fake AI-generated precedent led to violations of appellate procedure, with the court emphasizing that attorneys remain the gatekeepers for verifying the accuracy of every filing. Jennifer stresses that while AI can be a powerful tool, attorneys (and lay researchers) must independently verify every citation to avoid professional misconduct and uphold ethical standards. This is a must-watch for practitioners and anyone curious about how AI is reshaping legal practice. CITATIONS 1 Mata v. Avianca, Inc., 678 F. Supp. 3d 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) 2 Garner v. Cadence, 571 P.3d 812 (Utah Ct. App. 2025) For educational purposes only. Not intended to be used as legal advice. PLEASE SEND ALL INQUIRIES TO [email protected] •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• If you find this video useful, please LIKE it and SHARE it with colleagues you think will find it valuable. Please SUBSCRIBE to the channel (and click the bell) to receive notice when we publish new videos. If you have comments, please leave them in the section provided below. If you have specific questions, please call us at the number below. If you have other topics you'd like us to cover, please email us at [email protected] •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Music by Kevin MacLeod Werq Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b... •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• The Law Offices of Jennifer S. Carroll, P.A. is dedicated to advocating and protecting clients’ rights in state and federal appeals, post-trial proceedings, as well as pretrial and trial proceedings that involve resolution of significant legal issues. The firm’s mandate is to provide such representation at the highest quality for all clients. By the time a case reaches our firm, it is complicated. It either started that way, or it became difficult as a result of errors which occurred in the trial court proceedings. Our goal is to simplify these difficult cases and resolve them in the best interests of all clients. Law Offices of Jennifer S. Carroll, PA 1001 US-1 Jupiter, FL 33477 [email protected] (561) 478-2102 (888) 302-1320

Florida Appeals Journal 31: Preserving error for an appeal

How Common Are AI Hallucinations in Legal Filings? (And How to Stop Them)

Facing the Fear: Why We Avoid Estate Planning and How to Move Forward

Why AI Won’t Replace Lawyers—But Will Expose Them.

Jimmy Carr Roasts a 17-Year-Old Mouthy Mechanic In Front of His Parents!

Rules of the Road Series: Preparing for rulemaking – Before you start writing

THESE Apps Are SPYING on You — Shut Them Off NOW!

ChatGPT Power Tips for Lawyers & Law Firms. Embrace AI or Die :-)

Florida Appeals Journal 20: How to begin the appeals process

How ChatGPT Is Changing How People Find Lawyers (And What to Do About It)

Corporate Lawyers React to AI (Surprising Answer)

Florida Appeals Journal 32: Why federal summary judgment standards apply in Florida

#ChatGPT: Advanced Prompt Engineering for Lawyers and Other Professionals.

What Judges Actually Notice in the First 90 Seconds

The French Do Not Care About Work

(179) How AI Is Rewriting the Rules of Lawyering with Ray Brescia, Author of Lawyer 3.0

How To Think SO CLEARLY People Assume You're A Genius

The Most Mysterious File On The Internet

Florida Appeals Journal 27: What is a proper case for applying a contingency risk multiplier?

