كيف أخذ الأشاعرة دينهم من أرسطو ؟ جذور الفلسفة في العقيدة الأشعرية #محمد_بن_شمس_الدين

Did Aristotle mislead the Ash'arites? The roots of philosophy in Ash'arite doctrine An analytical episode that deconstructs the philosophical foundations of Ash'arite doctrine and reveals the extent of its influence by Aristotle's principles of theology, with a detailed comparison between the texts of philosophers and the writings of theologians on the affirmation and negation of divine attributes. 00:00 Episode introduction and questions about the Ash'arites' influence by Aristotle 01:06 Who was Aristotle? And the Peripatetic School's Stance on Theology 03:04 The First Teacher, Aristotle, and His Reference Books in Philosophy 05:42 The Principle of the First Mover and How It Was Adopted by Theological Schools 07:30 Denying Motion and Change as a Philosophical Basis for Denying Attributes 11:37 Presenting Aristotle's Books: Physics and Metaphysics 14:24 Denying the Senses' Perceivement of God: A Comparison Between Greek Philosophy and the Theological Schools 17:03 Comparing the Texts of Fakhr al-Din al-Razi and al-Baqillani with Aristotle's Discourse 25:54 The Book of Metaphysics and the Argument from the Axis and Motion 27:23 Refuting the Misconception of Necessity and Possibility in the Attributes of God 34:42 Limiting the Attributes to Seven and Their Agreement with the Principles of Philosophy 38:52 The Crime of Interpretation and Distortion of Texts to Conform to the Peripatetic Principles 45:01 The Fundamental Difference Between Theologians and Their Followers In this episode, you will discover how Greek philosophical ideas infiltrated the theological curricula taught today as if they were from The Essence of Religion. Sheikh Muhammad ibn Shams al-Din takes you on a profound scholarly journey to examine the true roots of Ash'ari doctrine, comparing with complete impartiality what the First Teacher, Aristotle, wrote in his books Physics and Metaphysics with what was established by prominent theologians such as al-Razi, al-Amidi, and al-Baqillani. You will clearly observe how the concept of the First Mover—unmoved and unchanging—was borrowed to negate God's active attributes, such as His ascension, descent, and coming, on the grounds that these necessitate change, origination, and dependence on a changer. The Sheikh presents the facts in their starkness, displaying translated philosophical texts alongside those of the theologians, revealing the astonishing similarity between them in denying direction, magnitude, and sensory perception, and how the pure understanding of the Qur'an was replaced by the complexities of the Peripatetic school. You will be astonished as you follow the meticulous analysis of their methodology for dealing with religious texts and how this philosophical borrowing led to a genuine crisis. When the clear texts of the Quran and Sunnah, such as the verse, “The Most Merciful is established on the Throne” (Quran 40:5) and the verse, “There is nothing like unto Him” (Quran 42:11), clashed with the rigid Aristotelian principles, some were forced to invent the method of interpretation. This, in reality, is a distortion of meanings, diverting them from their intended apparent sense, solely to conform to the pronouncements of the Greek philosophers. The Sheikh delves into the issue of necessity and possibility, a complex matter used to cast doubt on the meanings of the texts. He explains how the tripartite logical division of things into necessary, possible, and impossible is manipulated to include God's attributes within the realm of possibility and then negate them. The Sheikh refutes this flawed analogy with logical argumentation, demonstrating the weakness of such rational proofs when they overstep their bounds and delve into the unseen, which can only be understood through authentic divine revelation. This episode clarifies the Muslim's stance on these complexities, emphasizing that sound doctrine is derived from the two sources of revelation (the Quran and Sunnah), and that God Almighty is described as He has described Himself and as His Messenger has described Him, without distortion or misinterpretation. In conclusion, it offers a fair distinction between the prominent theologians who learned these philosophical principles and used them to twist the meanings of texts, and the common people who blindly followed them, mistakenly believing this to be the methodology of the righteous predecessors. This material serves as a valuable resource for every seeker of truth who wishes to differentiate between the words of the Creator and the words of created beings. Related Links: 00:35 For scholarly matters and research: Sheikh Muhammad bin Shams al-Din's main channel (   / mshmsdin  ) 00:39 For refuting doubts: The Scholarly Responses Channel (   / mshmsdin2  ) 00:42 For explanations of dozens of books: The Lessons and Audio Channel (   / mshmsdin3  ) 00:47 Join the Shams al-Din School for Seeking Knowledge (https://m...