Prince Harry security arrangements are lawful, say government lawyers

Bespoke security arrangements put in place for the Duke of Sussex are not unlawful, government lawyers told the Court of Appeal. Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Home Office, said the Prince's challenge should be refused. "The appeal is fairly to be characterised in the same way (as the earlier ruling)," Eadie said. "It involves a continued failure to see the wood for the trees, advancing propositions available only by reading small parts of the evidence, and now the judgment, out of context and ignoring the totality of the picture." Eadie stressed that Harry's security had not been entirely removed. Rather, he said protection is now determined on a case-by-case basis, reflecting both Harry's status as a non-working royal and his residence abroad. "We are in territory in which there are no right or wrong answers," he told the court. "There are matters of judgment against broad, soft-edged criteria… in which the security expertise of those involved is likely to be critical." SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos:    / @skynewscourts   Follow Sky News on Twitter:   / skynews   and   / skynewsbreak   Like us on Facebook:   / skynews   Follow us on Instagram:   / skynews   For more content go to http://news.sky.com and download our apps: Apple https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/sky-n... Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/de...