Why Acts is Fake History - Richard Carrier
In this video, Dr. Richard Carrier explains why the book of Acts is fake history. Please like and subscribe! Dr Carrier's article on the topic: https://www.richardcarrier.info/archi... Support me on Patreon: / modernatheism Chapters: 00:00 Intro 10:25 Some mistakes in Acts 12:04 Correct details in Acts? 17:55 Why Luke used Josephus 21:51 The "we" passages 26:32 Parallels with the Odyssey 31:26 The dating of Acts 33:40 Why is Paul's death not mentioned? 38:04 Persecution in Acts 44:09 Peter's jail break 47:07 Final thoughts
▶︎
Why the Nativity Stories are Fiction - Richard Carrier
▶︎
Richard Carrier just changed how I think about the historical Jesus
▶︎
Johannes Heil on How Jewish-Latin Texts Survived,and why They Survived in Christian Libraries Only
▶︎
The Case Against the Resurrection of Jesus | Richard Carrier
▶︎
Richard Carrier Turns the Tables on Theists
▶︎
I Interviewed a Josephus Expert. Luke Never Looked the Same. 🤯w/ Steve Mason
▶︎
They say Gospels date 70-90? It's a house of cards
▶︎
Richard Carrier | Mystery Cults & Christianity (2019)
▶︎
Origins of Christianity and the Biblical Canon (with Richard Carrier)
▶︎
Richard Carrier Refutes InspiringPhilosophy's case for the Gospels!
▶︎
I think I know who won (Richard Carrier vs Bart Ehrman)
▶︎
Acts Is surprisingly accurate. That's the problem
▶︎
This Destroys the Claim That Luke Was an Eyewitness
▶︎
Richard Carrier Destroys the Resurrection Argument – Must-See!
▶︎
The Council of Nicaea | How Politics and Persecution Shaped Christianity
▶︎
Refuting the Case for the Resurrection | Richard Carrier
▶︎
Scholar: Most early Christians never heard of the resurrection.
▶︎
Is Fr. Josiah Trenham Right About Protestants and Church History?
▶︎
Dr. Richard Carrier's lecture: Bayesian Josephus: How Likely Fake?
▶︎