Lomography Color Negative 800 ISO Review | All About Film
Lomography Color Negative 800 is a standard, rebadged, major-maker color film. I exhausted every lead I knew to find out who makes it and could not get a firm answer. In fact, it's distinctly possible that different makers have made it at different times. In the two years that I spent taking photos with the film, the performance characteristics changed somewhat with the photos from the stock I purchased in 2016 performing better than the stock I used throughout 2015. So whether this is Kodak, Fuji, or some other stock, I can't say with certainty. What I can say with certainty is that Lomography Color Negative 800 is fun; it's good to use in low-stress and experimental situations; and it's a great option for learning color negative film use. That said, at some point most photographers will want to graduate out of it and into advanced films like Kodak Portra 800. For what it is, Lomo is successful and good, but it's unpredictable with results that don't always turn out well. Here are some metrics from the two years I shot with Lomo 800. Twenty-one 35mm rolls (about 760 frames) Twelve 120 rolls (around 135 frames) Four 35mm rolls were unusable due to poor film performance. Six 120 rolls were unusable due to poor film performance. Seventy-nine 35mm frames turned out well enough to use in this video. Twenty 120 frames turned out well enough to use in this video. Those are VERY low hit rates compared to previous AAF videos in this series. Join this channel to get access to perks: / @davidhancock David Hancock's Amazon Author Page with Links to Select Camera Manual eBooks: https://www.amazon.com/David-Hancock/... Index: Skip the Intro: 0:15 Rated ISO: 1:38 Available Formats: 2:27 Subjective Film Characteristics: 2:33 Spectral Sensitivity: 6:53 Development Latitude: 7:36 Suggested Camera Settings: 9:04 Sample Photos and Thoughts: 9:24 800 ISO: 0:59 500 ISO: 6:56 400 ISO: 7:41 320 ISO: 8:14 250 ISO: 10:17 200 ISO: 10:58 100 ISO: 13:24 (not noted, but all are 120 6X6 images) References: http://www.apug.org/forums/forum.php http://istillshootfilm.org/ http://www.filmsnotdead.com/ https://plus.google.com/u/0/communiti... http://www.sprawls.org/ppmi2/FILMCON http://motion.kodak.com/motion/upload... http://motion.kodak.com/motion/upload... http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/d... http://home.comcast.net/~amitphotogra... http://www.nfsa.gov.au/preservation/h...

Kodak Ektar 100 C-41 Color Negative Film Review | All About Film

Kentmere Pan 400 ISO Black and White Film Review | All About Film

Are These Color Filmstocks...Identical? | Testing Portra, Lomography, and Funsaver

Lomography Metropolis Color Negative Film Review | All About Film

Kodak Portra 800 Film Review, Sample Photos, 35mm and 120 | All About Film

Testing Lomography’s Color Negative 120 Film Stocks

Kodak UltraMax 400 Color Negative Film Review | All About Film

Ranking the BEST Film Stocks! | 35mm Tier List

Fuji Acros II All About Film Review, Sample Photos, Developer Tests

Kodak Gold 200 Color Negative Film Review | All About Film

Ilford PanF+ 50 ISO Black and White Film | All About Film

CineStill vs Lomo vs Portra

The New Benchmark for Every Film Camera?

Is Lomography Color Negative just a Kodak Ultramax 400?

Lomo, Portra, and Kodak Funsaver 800 Compared: Is Portra 800 Worth It?

Developing Color Film (C41)

Lomography 800 - ROUNDING OUT THE CONSUMER FILM LINEUP | ROLL REVIEW

13 Color and Black and White Film Stocks Compared

Why I Stopped Using My $10,000 Lens As Much!

