Detailed New Guidelines of Supreme Court for Arrest | गिरफ्तारी के लिए सुप्रीम कोर्ट नए दिशानिर्देश

Dr. New Laws | Dr. New Law | Dr. Law | Sanjeev Sikarwar | Sanjeev Kumar | Law by Sanjeev sir | Giraftari se sambandhit supreme court ke naye nirdesh | New directions of Supreme court regarding arrest | Arrest ke liye supreme ke aadesh | November 2025 Supreme Court guideline | Arrest illegal | How to declare arrest illegal | Supreme Court Judgment Explained – Mihir Rajesh Shah vs State of Maharashtra (06.11.2025) Website: legallamp.info Telegram Channel: https://t.me/LegalLampofSanjeevSikarwar Facebook Page:   / legallampp   Instagram:   / legal_lamp   X: https://x.com/lamplegal This video explains in detail a landmark Supreme Court judgment Mihir Rajesh Shah vs State of Maharashtra (2025) relating to grounds of arrest, reasons of arrest, rights of accused, Article 22 of Constitution, Section 50 CrPC & 47 BNSS, Section 41A CrPC & 35 BNSS, and previous rulings Pankaj Bansal vs Union of India (2023) and Prabir Purkayastha vs NCT of Delhi (2024). In this judgment, the Supreme Court clarified important constitutional and statutory safeguards regarding arrest, compliance with procedure, communication of written grounds, and validity of detention. The Court discussed what constitutes “grounds of arrest”, whether reasons must be given in writing, constitutional protection under Article 22(1), and obligations of investigating officers under CrPC & BNSS. This video breaks down the judgment paragraph-by-paragraph using the original court PDF, making it simple for law students, judicial aspirants, advocates, police officers, and UPSC aspirants. ⭐ Key Topics Covered Article 22 & Right to be informed of grounds of arrest Section 41A CrPC & Section 35 BNSS — Notice of appearance Section 50 CrPC & Section 47 BNSS — Communication of grounds Difference between grounds of arrest vs reasons for arrest Impact of Pankaj Bansal (2023) & Prabir Purkayastha (2024) Procedural fairness, constitutional rights & bail jurisprudence Duty of police: Written grounds? Oral communication? Legal tests for valid arrest under Constitution & statute Practical examples & case-law discussion 🎯 Ideal For Law students Judiciary aspirants Law professors Criminal law practitioners Police & investigation trainees 📌 Watch till end to master this crucial topic in Criminal Procedure & Constitutional Law. Is video me Supreme Court ka latest judgement Mihir Rajesh Shah vs State of Maharashtra (2025) bilkul simple language me explain kiya gaya hai. Court ne clear kiya ki arrest ke waqt ground batana zaroori hai, sirf formality nahi. Article 22, Section 50 CrPC, Section 47 BNSS aur 41A CrPC / 35 BNSS ko detail me samjhaya gaya hai. Saath hi Pankaj Bansal (2023) aur Prabir Purkayastha (2024) ke principles ko compare karke bataya gaya hai ki written grounds dena kab mandatory hota hai, aur police ka duty kya hota hai. Video judiciary aspirants, advocates aur law students ke liye bahut helpful hai. इस वीडियो में सुप्रीम कोर्ट के महत्वपूर्ण निर्णय Mihir Rajesh Shah बनाम महाराष्ट्र राज्य (2025) की आसान और विस्तृत व्याख्या की गई है। कोर्ट ने स्पष्ट किया कि गिरफ़्तारी के समय आरोपी को गिरफ़्तारी के आधार की जानकारी देना अनिवार्य है। यह केवल औपचारिकता नहीं, बल्कि संवैधानिक अधिकार है। वीडियो में अनुच्छेद 22, धारा 50 CrPC, धारा 47 BNSS, धारा 41A CrPC और धारा 35 BNSS को सरल उदाहरणों के साथ समझाया गया है। साथ ही पिछली बेंच के निर्णय Pankaj Bansal (2023) और Prabir Purkayastha (2024) से तुलना कर बताया गया है कि लिखित आधार कब देना आवश्यक है। यह वीडियो कानून के छात्रों, न्यायिक अभ्यर्थियों और अधिवक्ताओं के लिए अत्यंत उपयोगी है। 🔔 Subscribe for more legal lectures on BNSS, BSA & BNS with case laws and practical examples! #law #legal #bestlawclasses #bestlawteacher #newcriminallaws #newcriminallaw #criminallaw #bestlaw #lawinhindi #lawwithcaselaws #sanjeevsikarwar #sanjeevkumar #sanjeev #legallamp #llbclasses #classesforjudiciary #judciaryaspirants #legalliteracy #drnewlaw #droflaw #legaldoctor #doctoroflaw #bestlegalinterpretation #bestinterpretation #interpretationoflaw