HRS 2026: Stroke Risk in PFA vs Radiofrequency Ablation
In this episode of #HRStv, host Oliver J. Monfredi, MBChB, PhD, FHRS, is joined by Enrico Ferro, MD, for an expert discussion on the comparative stroke risk associated with Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) versus traditional Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation.
▶︎
Heart Rhythm TV Update: Clinical performance of an atrial fibrillation burden tracking algorithm
▶︎
CardioNerds EP Spotlight: Updates in Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention in AFib
▶︎
HRS 2026: Long term effect on coronary artery after pulsed field ablation
▶︎
HRS 2026: Final Results of the LEADR LBBAP clinical trial
▶︎
The French Do Not Care About Work
▶︎
HRS 2026: ICE vs TEE for Watchman Procedures
▶︎
It's NOT Memory - 5 Early Dementia Signs Everyone Misses
▶︎
I’ve Done 10,000 Heart Surgeries. THIS Is The Real Cause of Heart Disease
▶︎
The contestant knows the right answer IMMEDIATELY! 🤯🚀💶 | Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?
▶︎
HRS 2026: Results of the ASCEND EV Pilot Study
▶︎
NEJM This Week — June 4, 2026
▶︎
WATCHMAN FLX Device Animation: Implant Technique
▶︎
#1 Best AT HOME Test to Find Clogged Arteries
▶︎
EP Lab Tour: Dr. Brett Gidney provides an overview of catheter ablation
▶︎
Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
▶︎
EPNomics: Advances in Transseptal Access
▶︎
(SPONSORED) EHRA 2026: Beyond PVI with Volt PFA – Multicenter Data & Substrate Ablation
▶︎
(SPONSORED) HRS 2026: Advancing AF Care - Clinical Evidence and the FARAPULSE™ PFA Platform
▶︎
Heart Rhythm TV Update: CIED Lead Management in 2026 - What’s Changed and How It Impacts Practice
▶︎