Specialized Camber Comp VS Trek Fuel EX 7 29 | MBR
Click here to subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/user/MBRmagaz... Specialized Camber Comp. VS Trek Fuel EX | MBR Specialized Camber Comp 29 £2,100 Multiple test winner, across multiple wheel sizes, the Specialized Camber has long been the short-travel trail bike against which all others are measured. And specifically it’s the measurements of the Camber that Specialized has tweaked for 2017. The chainstay length has shrunk, the front centre stretched, and the reach has grown. It’s a different proposition to previous test winners then. Part of that transformation has come about because the Camber now shares the same front end as the Stumpjumper. It’s what sets the two bikes apart, however, that’s more interesting. The Camber still gets 120mm travel, so that’s 15mm less than the Stumpy. The back end also has the older 142x12mm dropout spacing, so it’s not Boost or Plus compatible. There’s a traditional seatstay bridge too, and a much smaller rocker assembly with a co-pivot design for the shock yoke, which helps saves weight compared to the beefy back end found on the Stumpy. In that respect, the layout of the rear end on the Camber is much more in keeping with Specialized’s Epic XC race bike, even if the suspension response is very different. Trek Fuel EX 7 29 £2,200 The Plus version of the Fuel EX is an impressive bike, but it has had to contend with being bridesmaid, not once, but twice this year already. In 29er guise however, Trek has delivered a marriage made in heaven, where the Fuel EX 7 29 finally gets to toss a bouquet over its shoulder and leave its rivals scrambling to be next in line. Both versions of the Fuel EX share the new 130mm-travel Alpha Platinum aluminium frame, where double-pass smooth welds and complex hydroformed tubes make it almost indistinguishable from the carbon versions. How does Trek account for two different wheel sizes with one frame design? Easy. It uses its longstanding Mino Link geometry chip and different travel forks. So while the Plus version of the Fuel EX ships in the high geometry setting with a 140mm fork, the 29er comes slammed in the low position with 10mm less travel up front. The real beauty of the Mino Link, though, is that you can choose which setting you want to run it in. More at: MBR: http://www.mbr.co.uk/ Facebook: / mbrmagazine Twitter: / mbrmagazine Google +: https://plus.google.com/1007090999865...

Tested - Trek Fuel EX 9 29er

Trail Bike Of The Year - Contender - Specialized Camber Comp Carbon 29

Shop Talk: All About the Specialized Camber

TREK FUEL EX 9.7 TESTED | How does this flagship bike stack up to the competition?

2021 Trek Marlin VS Specialized Rockhopper VS Giant Talon Comparison!!

Aluminium Or Carbon Frames - What's The Difference?

$650 Vs $11,000 Mountain Bikes!

2018 SPECIALIZED CAMBER

2018 Specialized Camber Expert 29 | Test Ride and Review | XC or trail bike?

DREAM BUILD MTB - Trek Fuel EX

Everything I WISH I KNEW When I Started Mountain Biking

2017 Specialized Camber Expert Carbon 29 Test Ride & Review

Are old Mountain Bikes bad in 2026?

Do Hardtails Suck?

How to Ride Faster for Longer (The Real Science)

All New Trek Fuel EX 8 | First Impressions

Stumpjumper vs Trance X vs Mojo vs P-Train vs Blackthorn: Round Table Discussion | 2021 Field Test

Dan Atherton's Dyfi Off-Piste Death Ride: Did We Survive?!

27.5" Vs 29" Mountain Bike Wheels | The MTB Wheel Size Debate

